Pressure Transient Analysis in Drawdown and Buildup lesson (1)

Pressure Transient Analysis
in Drawdown and Buildup

Dual flow Dual shat shat in test


Exploration Well Test Objectives
1. Determine the nature of the formation fluids
2. Measure the well productivity
3. Measure temperature and pressure
4. Obtain samples for lab analysis
Exploration Well Test Objectives
5. Obtain information for reservoir description
 (permeability , heterogeneity)
6. Estimate completion efficiency

Dual Flow - Dual Shut in Test

Initial flow and shutin designed to establish
communication with the reservoir
Initial flow as short as possible
Major flow period long enough to give
sufficient depth of investigation
Dual Flow - Dual Shutin Test
Often 6 - 12 hours is adequate
At least six hours of stable operation to
ensure reasonable estimate of productivity
and good samples
Multirate necessary in gas wells
Major shutin 1 - 2 times the duration of
the flow period
Methods of Gaining Information on Reservoir Characteristics
A. Seismic and associated geological studies
B. Information obtained during the well drilling program
C. Wireline formation testing
 1. Virgin Reservoir (Exploration and Appraisal Wells)
Methods of Gaining Information on Reservoir Characteristics
 2. Produced Reservoir (New development wells)
D. Pressure - Flow testing of wells
 1. Exploration and appraisal wells (DST)
 2. Production or injection wells
E. Analysis of reservoir performance
 - simulator history matching

Principal Objectives of Well Testing

Determine the average permeability of the reservoir
Determine the near wellbore alteration i.e. the skin factor
Measure the reservoir pressure
Attempt to locate the position of boundaries / discontinuities
Types of Pressure Transient Test
Principal Objectives of Well Testing
Pressure Drawdown (Reservoir Limit) Test
Pressure Bu ildup or Fa lloff Test
 - Drill Stem Te st (Downhole valve)
 - Production or Injectio n Well Test
In terference Test
Pulse Test - horizontal or vertical


Transient Well Testing
Buildup Analysis - Horner (Theis) Plot

From Steady-State Radial Flow TheoryNear Wellbore Altered Zone


Hawkins Equation - Open-Hole

From Steady-State Radial Flow Theory

Well Productivity



The well P.I. depends mainly on:
Permeability - Thickness Product
Oil Viscosity
Overall Skin Factor
 Drainage radius
 Wellbore radius
 Formation volume factor
are of secondary importance

Well Productivity Index, Jsss



Determination of Average Pressure


Flow Regimes


Detection of Depletion



Some Well Test Models
Homogeneous Finite
Composite Infinite
Reservoir
No Flow
Boundary
Composite Infinite
Reservoir
No flow boundary
Single Linear Fault






Model Reservoir


Assumptions

Well completed over entire thickness of formation
Homogeneous and isotropic porous medium
Uniform formation thickness
Bounded above and below by impermeable barrier
s
Porosity and permeability constant
Assumptions
Lead to Radial 1-D Flow
Formation contains a single phase liquid with constant viscosity
and small and constant compressibility
Leads to Diffusivity Equation

Nomenclature

k Permeability of porous medium
 Porosity of porous medium
 Fluid viscosity Fluid density
c Fluid compressibility h Formation thickness
φ
µ
ρ
p Pressure t Time
Nomenclature
r Wellbore radius
q Oil flow-rate (stock tank conditions)
B Formation volume factor r External radius
r Radial coordinate p Initial pressure
 Hydraulic diffusivity

To be continued 


FISHING ECONOMICS

 FISHING ECONOMICS
The option of abandoning fishing operations and sidetracking the well should be taken on
economic grounds unless there are exceptional logistical, legislative or safety grounds.
Before giving up on a fishing job the cost of sidetracking operations together with re-drilling
to the original depth needs to be calculated. This cost when converted to equivalent rig day
rate days can be used to assess the amount of time that it is economic to pursue fishing
operations. The procedure is as follows:
a. Calculate the total cost of the fish to be left in hole.
b. Calculate the cost of backing-off and setting of a cement plug prior to sidetracking. This
should include all rental and consumable items, including personnel.
c. Calculate the cost of the sidetrack including directional equipment and casing milling
equipment (if applicable).
d. Calculate the cost of drilling to the original depth. This should be based on the time to drill
the original section plus an additional 10% to account for the directional aspects.
Total cost is therefore = a + b + c + d.
This should be converted to rig days by dividing the total cost by the rig day rate.
Abandonment of fishing operations should be considered when the fishing time has reached
½ the above number of days, and the probability of completing the fishing operation is
gradually becoming small.

Hole Problems Lec ( 3 )

MECHANICAL STICKING 

CAUSES OF MECHANICAL STICKING
In mechanical sticking the pipe is usually completely stuck with little or no circulation. In
differential sticking, the pipe is completely stuck but there is full circulation.Mechanical
sticking can occur as result of the hole packing off (or bridging) or due to formation & BHA
(wellbore geometry).
Hole pack off (bridging) can be caused by any one or a combination of the following
processes:
1. Settled cuttings due to inadequate hole cleaning
2. Shale instability
3. Unconsolidated formations
4. Fractured and faulted formations
5. Cement blocks
6. Junk falling in the well
The formation & BHA (wellbore geometry) can also cause mechanical sticking as follows:
1. Key seating
2. Mobile formations
3. Undergauge hole
4. Ledges and micro doglegs
Understanding the cause of the mechanical sticking problem is key to solving the problem.
This is because the cause determines the action required to free the pipe. For example, if the
pipe becomes stuck while running in an open hole, it is likely that the BHA has hit a ledge or
gone into an undergauge hole. In other words, the sticking problem is due to the geometry of
the wellbore. As will be seen later, the freeing action depends largely on identifying and
curing the problem that caused mechanical sticking.
A discussion of each of the above processes will now follow.

HOLE PACK OFF CAUSES
1- SETTLED CUTTINGS
Settled cuttings due to inadequate hole cleaning (Figure 12.4) is one of the major causes of
stuck pipe. Best hole cleaning occurs around large OD pipe such as drillcollars, while
cuttings beds can form higher up the hole where the pipe OD is smaller. The problem of
settled cuttings is particularly severe in horizontal and high directional wells. In these wells,
when the pipe is moved upwards, the cuttings may be compacted around the BHA. This can
result in complete packing off of the drillstring and eventual pipe sticking.
With increasing deviation of the wellbore, drilling fluid parameters, drilling practices and
hydraulics should be optimised in order to effectively clean the hole.
In vertical wells, good hole cleaning is
achieved by the selection and
maintenance of suitable mud parameters
and ensuring that the circulation rate
selected results in an annular velocity
(around 100-120 ft/min) which is greater
than the slip velocity of the cuttings.
Highly inclined wells are particularly
difficult to clean due to the tendency of
drilled cuttings to fall to the low side of
the hole.In a highly deviated well, the
cuttings have only a small distance to fall
before they settle on the low side of the
hole and form a cuttings bed. Cuttings
beds develop in boreholes with
inclinations of 30 degrees or greater, depending on the flow rates and suspension properties
of the drilling fluid.Complete removal of cuttings beds by circulation may be impossible.
Once cuttings beds have formed, there is always a risk that on pulling the pipe up the hole,
the cuttings are dragged from the low side of the hole forming a cuttings pile (Figure 12.4).
If this pile accumulates around the BHA, it may plug the hole and cause the pipe to
mechanically stuck.
Besides causing stuck pipe, settled cuttings can result in:
• formation break down due to increased ECD
• slow ROP
• excessive overpull on trips
• increased torque
Hole cleaning is controlled by a number of parameters which were discussed in Chapter 8.
These include:
1. mud rheology, in particular the YP and gel strength
2. flow rate
3. hole angle
4. mud weight
5. ROP
6. hole diameter
7. drillpipe rotation
8. presence of wash outs

2 - SHALE INSTABILITY
Shale represents 70% of the rocks encountered whilst drilling oil and gas wells. Also shale
instability is by far the most common type of wellbore instability. Shales are classified as
being either brittle or swelling.
Brittle Shales
Instability in brittle shales is caused
mainly by tangential stresses around the
wellbore which are induced as a result of
the well being drilled. The induced
stresses depend on the magnitude of the
in-situ stresses, wellbore pressure, rock
strength and hole angle and direction.
Formation dip may also be a
contributory factor to brittle shale
failure. A safe mud envelope may be
established which can be used to
determine the safe mud weights to
prevent either tensile failure or collpase (compressive) failure.
Brittle shales tend to fail by breaking into pieces and sloughing into the hole. Rig indications
of brittle shale failure include:
• large amounts of angular, splintery cavings when circulating the well
• drag on trips




• large amounts of hole fill.

3 - Swelling Shales
Shales swelling (Figure 12.6) can be caused by hydrational processes or by the osmotic
potential which develops between the pore fluid of the shale and drilling fluid salinity.
The swelling of shales (Figure 12.6) is controlled by several complex factors including:
• Clay content
• Type of clay minerals (ie hydratable or inert)
• Pore water content and composition
• Porosity
• In-situ stresses
• Temperature
The degree of clay hydration depends on
the clay type and the cation exchange
capacity (CEC) of the clay content. The
greater the CEC, the more hydratable is the
clay. In drilling operations the following
clay types are encountered:
• Smectite with CEC of 80-150
meq/100g. Most of the
hydratable shales (termed
gumbos) belong to this group.
Bentonite clays belong to the
smectite group.
• Illite with CEC of 10-40 meq/100g.
• Chlorite with CEC of 10-40 meq/100g.
• Kaolinite with CEC of 3-10 meq/100g.
To aid the understanding of shale swelling, the following points must be considered:
1. The permeability of shales is very low, typically in the range of 10 -9 to 10 -6 Darcy.
(1 md = 10 –13 m2)
2. Thus, filter cakes do not form on shale surfaces.
3. However, water can still migrate into the shale (helped by the mud overbalance).
4. Water infusion into the shale will allow chemical effects to start working inside the
shale and at the exposed surfaces of the wellbore.
5. The pore pressure inside the shale section will also increase, contributing to destabilisation.
6. The low permeability of shale means that swelling effects can take considerable
time and shale instability can be a delayed effect.
Water can flow into or out of the shale through several processes; the most important ones
are hydrational and osmotic forces:
1. Hydration: This is by far the most common cause of shale hydration where water
flows into the shale and hydrate the clay plates. Highly hydratable shales are
composed of predominantly smectite- based clays. These clays (e.g.
montmorillonite) absorb water into the inner-layer space due to the high negative
charge on the surface of the clay platelet. This process results in the expansion of
the clay to several times its original volume.
Hydratable shales are usually found near the surface ±7000
At grater depths, the process of diagenesis converts the clay minerals into more stable forms, However, hydratable shales have been found in some wells at depths
greater than 7000 ft due to the inhibition of the diagenetic processes.
2. Chemical osmosis: This type of flow occurs at semi-permeable membranes which
are permeable to water and impermeable to solute ions or molecules. Shale surface
acts as a semi-permeable membrane allowing water to flow into or out of the shale
depending on the solute concentration of the mud and pore water of the shale. Water
flows through the semi-impermeable membrane from the low concentration to high
concentration solution. In terms of chemical jargon, water flows from solutions of
high water activity to solutions of low water activity until the concentrations of the
two solutions are equalised. (Water activity (aw): ratio of vapour pressure of water
in a solution, drilling mud or shale pore water to the vapour pressure of pure water
at the same temperature.)
3. Chemical diffusion: This is caused by the flow of solutes (soluble solids) from
areas of high concentration to low concentration. Hence if the concentration of
certain ions or molecules in the drilling mud is greater than those in the formation
water of the shale then the solute will flow into the formation provided there are no
barriers to flow. Solutes can also flow out of the shale if their concentration is
greater than that in the drilling mud. No flow will occur if solute concentration is the
same in mud and shale.
4. Hydraulic diffusion; water flows in the direction of decreasing hydraulic pressure
gradient (Darcy’s Law). This flow can only occur if the rock has permeability.
Shale hydration – Rig Site Indications 
• Soft, hydrated or mushy cuttings
• Clay balls in the flowline
• torque and drag fluctuations
• Shale shaker screens blind off
• Increase in LGS, filter cake thickness, PV, YP and MBT (Methlyene blue test)
• Increase or fluctuations in pump pressure
• Circulation is restricted or sometimes impossible
• Bit and stabiliser balling when POH
• Generally occurs while POH (Tight hole) and problems while logging
• Problems increase with time.

Shale hydration – Prevention and Cure
• Use Inhibited mud system or displace to OBM system if possible
• Maintain mud properties as planned
• Addition of various salts (potassium, sodium, calcium) will reduce chemical
attraction between shale & water
• Addition of encapsulating polymers to WBM
• Reduce exposure time and case off the hydrated shale as soon as possible
• Regular wiper trips
• Good hole cleaning (especially in extended reach wells, ERW)


3 - UNCONSOLIDATED FORMATIONS
Unconsolidated formations are usually encountered
near the surface and include: loose sands, gravel and
silts. Unconsolidated formations have low cohesive
strengths and will therefore collapse easily (Figure
12.7) and flow into the wellbore in lumps and pack off
the drillstring.
Surface rig indications of an impending stuck pipe
situation near top hole are: increasing torque, drag and
pump pressure while drilling. Other signs include
increased ROP and large fill on bottom.
A common remedial action is to use a mud system with
an impermeable filter cake to reduce fluid invasion into
the rock. Reduction of flow rate, and in turn annular velocity, will reduce erosion of the hole
and removal of the filter cake.



4 - FRACTURED AND FAULTED FORMATIONS
This is a common problem in limestone and chalk formations. Several symptoms can be
observed on surface including:
• large and irregular rock fragments on shakers
• increased torque, drag and ROP
• small lost circulation
These fractured and faulted formations may fall into the Wellbore as soon as they are drilled
as the stresses which originally held them together are relieved by the drilling of the hole. In
addition, excessive drillstring vibrations cause the pipe to whip downhole and break and
dislodge the exposed fractured/faulted rocks. Therefore it is important to reduce drillstring
whipping to prevent dislodging of rock fragments when drilling fractured and faulted rocks.
In all cases, it is imperative to keep the hole clean in order to reduce the chances of hole
packing off.
If the drillstring is stuck in limestone or chalk formations and cannot be freed by jarring, an
inhibited hydrochloric acid pill may be spotted around the stuck zone.The acid will react
with the chalk/limestones, dissolving the rock around the pipe.If the pill is successful the
pipe will be freed quickly.

5 - CEMENT BLOCKS
Stuck pipe can be caused by cement blocks falling from the rat hole beneath the casing shoe
or from cement plugs.
This problem may be prevented by minimising the rat hole to a maximum of 5 ft and also by
ensuring a good tail cement is placed around the shoe .
The drillstring can also be stuck in green cement which has not set properly. This usually
occurs after setting a cement plug inside the casing or open hole. If the drillstring is run too
fast into the top of the cement and if the cement is still green then the cement can flash set
around the pipe and cause the pipe to be permanently stuck.

The author has come across several situations where the top of the cement is soft when
tagged, but literally within seconds of tagging the cement, the cement flash sets around the
BHA causing mechanical sticking. One possible explanation for this sudden flash setting is
that the energy release while circulating and rotating is enough to cause flash setting. It is
recommended that circulation is started two to three stands above the expected top of cement
and that WOB should be kept to absolute minimum.
6 - JUNK
Several recorded incidents of pipe sticking occurred as a result of junk falling into the hole.
This include junk falling into the wellbore from the surface or from upper parts of the hole.
Typical junks dropped from surface include pipe wrenches, spanners, broken metal, hard
hats etc. This problem can be minimised by keeping the hole covered when no tools are run
in the hole.
Junks can also fall from within the well including broken packer elements, liner hanger slips
and metal swarf from milling operation.

HOLE PROBLEMS lec ( 2 )

DIFFERENTIAL STICKING FORCE

The differential sticking force is given by:
Differential sticking force (DSF) = (Hs - Pf) x effective contact area x friction factor (12.1)
whereHs = hydrostatic pressure of mud
Pf = formation pressure
In Equation (12.1), the most difficult terms to determine are the effective contact area and
the friction factor between the mud cake and the pipe steel. To a first approximation the
effective area may be calculated as the product of the height of the exposed permeable
formation times 20% of the perimeter of the drillpipe or drillcollars.
Another equation for estimating the contact area is given by
It should observed that none of the equations given for estimating the contact area are
completely valid as the contact area is affected by a number of variables including the
friction factor (time-dependent), the amount of bend in the drillpipe or collars, hole angle
and thickness of the filter cake.
The surface estimate of the thickness of the filter cake can be very different from that
occurring downhole.

Example : Differential Sticking Force
Determine the magnitude of the differential sticking force across a permeable zone of 30 ft
in thickness using the following data:
Differential pressure = 500 psi
Area of contact is 20% of effective drillpipe perimeter
Filter cake = 1/2 in (12.7mm); friction factor = 0.1.
Drillpipe OD: 5"
Solution
Perimeter of drillpipe = π x OD = π x 5 = 15.71 in
DSF = (Hs - Pf) x h x 20% x 15.71
= 500psi x (30ft x 12 in) x 20% x 15.71
= 565,560 lb

FREEING DIFFERENTIALLY STUCK PIPE .

There are basically two ways in which a differentially stuck pipe can be released:
• reduction of hydrostatic pressure
• spotting pipe release agents

 REDUCTION OF HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE 
The reduction of hydrostatic pressure is the obvious and most successful method of freeing a differentially stuck pipe. The lowering of the hydrostatic pressure reduces the side loading
forces on the pipe and therefore reduces the force required to free the pipe from the filter
cake. There are several methods by which this may be achieved. However prior to
implementing this action the following factors should be seriously considered:
1. Are there other pressured zones in the open hole section?
2. Will these exposed zones kick if the hydrostatic pressure is reduced?
3. The confidence level in the accuracy of pore pressure estimates made while drilling
and the pressure control equipment.
4. The effects of a reduction in hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical stability of all
exposed formations.
5. The volumes of base oil or water required to achieve the required reduction in
hydrostatic pressure. (This may well influence the method chosen).
All the above factors need to be carefully considered prior to reducing the hydrostatic
pressure as the potential for inducing a well control problem or formation instability are
considerably increased. The following methods for reducing hydrostatic pressure can be
used:
• circulation & reducing mud weight
• displacing the choke
• the ‘U’ tube method

CIRCULATION & REDUCING MUD WEIGHT
In this method, the drilling mud is circulated and its weight is gradually reduced. The
minimum mud weight required to balance the highest pore pressure in open hole should be
determined and the mud weight cut back in small stages. Close attention must be made to all
kick indicators whilst circulating down (reducing) the mud weight, frequent flow checks
should also be made. Whilst reducing the mud weight, tension should be held on the pipe.
Disadvantages of this methods are:
• It is slow, and remember the force required to free pipe is time dependent.
• The volume increase required may overload the surface pit handling capability.
This may be a serious problem when OBM is used.
• The active volume will be increasing during the reduction in mud weight,
making kick detection difficult.

DISPLACING THE CHOKE
This method is applicable to floating rigs where BOPS are placed on the seabed. The
hydrostatic pressure can be quickly and effectively reduced by displacing the choke line to
base oil or water. The well is shut in using the annular preventer and the displaced choke line
opened thereby reducing the overbalance.Note that the annular preventer isolates the
wellbore from the hydrostatic head of mud in the riser from rig floor to the annular preventer.
The advantage of this method is that if any influx is taken, the well can be immediately
killed by closing the choke and opening the annular. This action again exposes the well to the
active hydrostatic pressure from rig floor to TD. The disadvantage of this method is that the
amount of reduction in hydrostatic pressure is limited to the water depth. This may well
result in a limited reduction in shallow water, or in the case of deep water, an excessive
reduction in hydrostatic pressure

THE ‘U’ TUBE METHOD
The U-tube method is used to reduce the hydrostatic pressure of mud to a level equal or
slightly higher than the formation pressure of the zone across which the pipe got
differentially stuck.Clearly, the objective is to free the differentially stuck pipe safely without
losing control of the well by inadvertently inducing underbalanced conditions. A pipe free
agent should be spotted across the permeable zone prior to adopting the ‘U’ tube method.
The mathematics required for the full method is laborious, however,

SPOTTING PIPE RELEASE AGENTS
The severity of differentially stuck pipe can be reduced by the spotting of pipe release
agents. Pipe release agents are basically a blend of surfactants and emulsifiers mixed with
base oil or diesel oil and water to form a stable emulsion. They function by penetrating the
filter cake, therefore making it easier to remove and at the same time, reduce the surface
tension between the pipe and the filter cake.
Due to the time dependency of the severity of differential sticking, the pipe release agent
should be spotted as soon as possible after differential sticking is diagnosed. Typically the
pill will be prepared whilst initially attempting to mechanically free the pipe; ie by pulling
and rotating.
Example : Reduction of Hydrostatic Pressure
Calculate the volume of oil required to reduce the hydrostatic pressure in a well by 500 psi,
using the following data:
mud weight = 10 ppg
hole depth = 9,843 ft
drillpipe = OD/ID = 5 in/4.276 in
hole size = 12.25 in
specific gravity oil = 0.8 (6.7 ppg)
Solution
Initial hydrostatic pressure = 0.052 x10x 9843 = 5,118 psi
Required hydrostatic pressure = 5,118 - 500 = 4,618 psi
Thus,
New hydrostatic pressure = pressure due to (mud and oil) in drillpipe
4618 = 0.052x 10xY (mud) +0.052x (6.7) x (9843-Y) (oil)
where Y = height of mud in drillpipe.
Therefore,Y = 6,927 ft
Hence,
height of oil = 9,843 - 6,927 = 2,916 ft
volume of oil = capacity of drillpipe x height
= 290.79 ft3
= 51.7 bbl
Note that when the required volume of diesel oil is pumped inside the drillpipe, the
hydrostatic pressure at the drillpipe shoe becomes 4,618 psi, while the hydrostatic pressure
in the annulus is still 5,118 psi. This difference in the pressure of the two limbs of the well
causes a back-pressure on the drillpipe which is the driving force for removing the diesel oil
from the drillpipe and reducing the level of mud in the annulus. It is only when the annulus
level decreases that the hydrostatic pressure against the formation is reduced and the stuck
pipe may be freed.
When the formation pressure is unknown, it is customary to reduce the hydrostatic pressure
of mud in small increments by the U-tube technique until the pipe is free.
A variation of the U-tube method is to pump water into both the annulus and the drillpipe to
reduce hydrostatic pressure to a value equal to or just greater than the formation pressure.
This method is best illustrated by an example.
Example : : Simplified U-Tube Method
The following data refer to a differentially stuck pipe at 11,400 ft:
Formation pressure = 5,840 psi
Intermediate casing = 9.625 in, 40# at 10,600 ft
Drillpipe = OD /ID = 5/4.276 in
Mud density = 12.3 ppg
It is required to reduce the hydrostatic pressures in the drillpipe and the annulus so that both
are equal to the formation pressure.
Calculate the volumes of water required in both the annulus and the drillpipe, assuming that
the density of saltwater = 8.65 ppg.
Solution
Annulus Side
Assume the height of water in the annulus to be Y.
Required hydrostatic pressure at stuck point = 5,840 psi or
5,840 = 0.0.52x 8.65x Y + 0.052x 12.3x (11,400-Y)
Y = 7,647 ft (length of water column)
Required volume of water in annulus
= annular capacity between drillpipe and 9.625" casing x height of water
= 0.0515 (bbl/ft) x 7,6476
= 393.8 bbl
Hence, pump 393.8 bbl of water into the annulus to reduce the hydrostatic pressure in the
annulus to 5,840 psi at the stuck point. When 393.8 bbl of water is pumped into the annulus,
the drillpipe is still filled with the original mud of 12.3 ppg having a hydrostatic pressure at
the stuck point of (0.052x12.3 x 11,400) = 7,291 psi. Thus, a back-pressure equivalent to
7,291 – 5840= 1,451 psi will be acting on the annulus and will be attempting to equalise
pressures by back-flowing water from the annulus.
In order to contain the 393.8 bbl of water in the annulus, the drillpipe must also contain a
column of water equal in height to that in the annulus.
Thus,
volume of water required in drillpipe to prevent back-flow from annulus
= capacity of drillpipe x height of water = 0.0178 (bbl/ft) x 7,647 ft = 136 bbl
Balancing of the columns of water in the drillpipe and in the annulus can be achieved as
follows: (a) circulate 393.8 bbl of water down the annulus; (b) circulate 136 bbl of water
down the annulus; (c) circulate 136 bbl of water in the drillpipe to remove 136 bbl of water
from the annulus and to reduce the hydrostatic pressure in the drillpipe to 5,840 psi. At this
stage the hydrostatic pressure in the well is equal to the formation pressure of 5,840 psi.
If the well should kick during the operation, reverse-circulate down the annulus using the
12.3 ppg (i.e. original density) mud to recover all the water from the drillpipe. Then circulate
in the normal way through the drillpipe using 12.3 ppg mud until all the water is removed
from the annulus.

HOLE PROBLEMS lec ( 1 )

 IDENTIFICATION OF HOLE Problem
An event which causes the drilling operation to stop is described as a Non-Productive Time
(NPT) event. Pipe sticking and lost circulation are the two main events which cause NPT in
the drilling industry. Well kicks, of course, require operations to stop and when they occur
can result in a large NPT. At the time of writing this book, the average NPT in the drilling
industry is 20%.
There are many events which cause NPT in the drilling industry: see Chapter 15 for
details.Hence rather than detail every minor hole problem that has ever been recorded, this
chapter will deal with the main problems normally encountered while drilling. These
problems are: differential sticking, mechanical sticking and lost circulation. There will also
be a discussion of other miscellaneous problems.
1.1 PIPE STICKING
When the pipe becomes stuck, there are two key actions that will best influence the chance
of freeing the pipe:
• Determination of the cause of the stuck pipe incident.
• The initial response of the Driller and subsequent actions taken.
During the earliest stages of trying to free the pipe, the Drilling Supervisor should collate all
the relevant information and determine what caused the pipe to stick. This may well be
obvious from the well conditions that existed before the pipe became stuck. An incorrect
assessment of the cause of pipe sticking problem will reduce the chance of freeing the stuck
pipe.





There are basically two mechanisms for pipe sticking:
1. Differential Sticking
2. Mechanical Sticking
Mechanical sticking can be caused by:
• Hole pack off or bridging, or

• Formation and BHA (wellbore geometry)
Table 12.1 gives a summary of the pipe sticking mechanisms and their most common
causes.


2 - D. . I.F . F. E. .R . E. N. .T . I.A . L. . S. T. .I C. .K . I. N. .G
2.1 CAUSES OF DIFFERENTIAL STICKING
During all drilling operations the drilling fluid hydrostatic pressure is designed and
maintained at a level which exceeds the formation pore pressure by usually 200 psi. In a
permeable formation, this pressure differential (overbalance) results in the flow of drilling
fluid filtrates from the well to the formation. As the filtrate enters the formation the solids in
the mud are screened out and a filter cake is deposited on the walls of the hole. The pressure
differential across the filter cake will be equal to the overbalance.
When the drillstring comes into contact
with the filter cake, the portion of the
pipe which becomes embedded in the
filter cake is subjected to a lower
pressure than the part which remains in
contact with the drilling fluid. As a
result, further embedding into the filter
cake is induced.
The drillstring will become
differentially stuck if the overbalance
and therefore the side loading on the
pipe is high enough and acts over a
large area of the drillstring. This is
shown diagrammatically in Figure
12.1.
The signs of differential sticking are the clearest in the field. A pipe is differentially stuck if:
1. drillstring can not be moved at all, i.e. up or down or rotated

2. circulation is unaffected
Mathematically, the differential sticking force depends on the magnitude of the overbalance
and the area of contact between the drillpipe and the porous zone.Hence
Differential force = (mud hydrostatic – formation pressure) x area of contact
Hence for the data shown in Figure 12.2, and assuming the formation contacts only 4" of the
drillpipe perimeter, then the differential force is given by:
Differential Force = (5000-4000) psi x 4 x 00 = 1,200,000 lb
A more accurate form of the above equation contains a term for the friction factor between
the drillstring (steel) and the filter cake is given in Equation (12.1).
The force required to free a differentially
stuck pipe depends upon several factors,
namely:
1. The magnitude of the
overbalance. This adds to any side
forces which already exist due to
hole deviation.
2. The coefficient of friction
between the pipe and the filter
cake. The coefficient of friction
increases with time, resulting in
increasing forces being required
to free the pipe with time. Hence, when differentially stuck, procedures to free the
pipe must be adopted immediately. Figure 12.3 shows the coefficient of friction vs.
time for a bentonite filter cake which shows a 10 fold increase in under 3 hours







The surface area of the pipe embedded in
the filter cake is another significant factor.
The greater the surface area, the greater
the force required to free the pipe.
Thickness of filter cake and pipe diameter
will obviously have a great effect on the
surface area. It is for reasons of reducing
available surface area that spiral drill
collars are often specified
when drilling sections which exhibit the
potential for differential sticking
problems.
Statistically, differential sticking is found
to be the major cause of stuck pipe
incidents, hence great care should be taken
in the planning phase to minimise the overbalance wherever possible. However, in certain
circumstances, drilling with minimum overbalance is not be possible, as is the case for large
gas reservoirs (e.g. the Morecambe Field in the UK) where the pressure differential across
the reservoir starts at the minimum overbalance (200 psi) and increases substantially with
depth to a maximum of 1300 psi. In these cases, strict adherence to precautionary drilling
practices and good communication between personnel will help reduce the incidence of
stuck pipe.


Daily Oil Price


Bases and Base Networks

Bases and Base Networks
Bases (base stations) are important in gravity and magnetic surveys, and in
some electrical and radiometric work. They may be:
1. Drift bases – Repeat stations that mark the starts and ends of sequences
of readings and are used to control drift.
2. Reference bases – Points where the value of the field being measured has
already been established.
3. Diurnal bases – Points where regular measurements of background are
made whilst field readings are taken elsewhere.
A single base may fulfil more than one of these functions. The reliability
of a survey, and the ease with which later work can be tied to it, will often
depend on the quality of the base stations. Base-station requirements for
individual geophysical methods are considered in the appropriate chapters,
but procedures common to more than one type of survey are discussed below.
 Base station principles
There is no absolute reason why any of the three types of base should coincide,
but surveys tend to be simpler and fewer errors are made if every drift
base is also a reference base. If, as is usually the case, there are too few
existing reference points for this to be done efficiently, the first step in a
survey should be to establish an adequate base network.
It is not essential that the diurnal base be part of this network and, because
two instruments cannot occupy exactly the same point at the same time, it
may actually be inconvenient for it to be so. However, if a diurnal monitor
has to be used, work will normally be begun each day by setting it up and
end with its removal. It is good practice to read the field instruments at a drift
base at or near the monitor position on these occasions, noting any differences
between the simultaneous readings of the base and field instruments.
 ABAB ties
Bases are normally linked together using ABAB ties (Figure 1.13). A reading
is made at Base A and the instrument is then taken as quickly as possible






to Base B. Repeat readings are then made at A and again at B. The times
between readings should be short so that drift, and sometimes also diurnal
variation, can be assumed linear. The second reading at B may also be the
first in a similar set linking B to a Base C, in a process known as forward
looping.
Each set of four readings provides two estimates of the difference in field
strength between the two bases, and if these do not agree within the limits
of instrument accuracy (±1 nT in Figure 1.13), further ties should be made.
Differences should be calculated in the field so that any necessary extra links
can be added immediately.

 Base networks
Most modern geophysical instruments are accurate and quite easy to read,
so that the error in any ABAB estimate of the difference in value between
two points should be trivial. However, a final value obtained at the end of
an extended series of links could include quite large accumulated errors. The
integrity of a system of bases can be assured if they form part of a network in
which each base is linked to at least two others. Misclosures are calculated by
summing differences around each loop, with due regard to sign, and are then
reduced to zero by making the smallest possible adjustments to individual
differences. The network in Figure 1.14 is sufficiently simple to be adjusted






by inspection. A more complicated network could be adjusted by computer,
using least-squares or other criteria, but this is not generally necessary in
small-scale surveys.
 Selecting base stations
It is important that bases be adequately described and, where possible, permanently
marked, so that extensions or infills can be linked to previous work
by exact re-occupations. Concrete or steel markers can be quickly destroyed,
either deliberately or accidentally, and it is usually better to describe station
locations in terms of existing features that are likely to be permanent. In any
survey area there will be points that are distinctive because of the presence
of manmade or natural features. Written descriptions and sketches are the
best way to preserve information about these points for the future. Good
sketches are usually better than photographs, because they can emphasize
salient points.
Permanence can be a problem, e.g. maintaining gravity bases at international
airports is almost impossible because building work is almost always
under way. Geodetic survey markers are usually secure but may be in isolated
and exposed locations. Statues, memorials and historic or religious buildings
often provide sites that are not only quiet and permanent but also offer some
shelter from sun, wind and rain.

Global Positioning Satellites

Small, reasonably cheap, hand-held GPS receivers have been available since
about 1990. Until May 2000, however, their accuracy was no better than
a few hundred metres in position and even less in elevation, because of
deliberate signal degradation for military reasons (‘selective availability’ or
SA). The instruments were thus useful only for the most regional of surveys.
For more accurate work, differential GPS (DGPS) was required, involving
a base station and recordings, both in the field and at the base, of the estimated
ranges to individual satellites. Transmitted corrections that could be
picked up by the field receiver allowed real-time kinetic positioning (RTKP).
Because of SA, differential methods were essential if GPS positioning was
to replace more traditional methods in most surveys, even though the accuracies
obtainable in differential mode were usually greater than needed for
geophysical purposes.
 Accuracies in hand-held GPS receivers
The removal of SA dramatically reduced the positional error in non-differential
GPS, and signals also became easier to acquire. It is often now possible to
obtain fixes through forest canopy, although buildings or solid rock between
receiver and satellite still present insuperable obstacles. The precision of the
readouts on small hand-held instruments, for both elevations and co-ordinates,
is generally to the nearest metre, or its rough equivalent in latitude and longitude
(0.00001◦). Accuracies are considerably less, because of multi-path
errors (i.e. reflections from topography or buildings providing alternative
paths of different lengths) and because of variations in the properties of the
atmosphere. The main atmospheric effects occur in the ionosphere and depend
on the magnitude and variability of the ionization. They are thus most severe
during periods of high solar activity, and particularly during magnetic storms
(Section 3.2.4).
Because of atmospheric variations, all three co-ordinates displayed on a
hand-held GPS will usually vary over a range of several metres within a
period of a few minutes, and by several tens of metres over longer time
intervals. Despite this, it is now feasible to use a hand-held GPS for surveys
with inter-station separations of 100 m or even less because GPS errors,
even if significant fractions of station spacing, are not, as are so many other
errors, cumulative. Moreover, rapid movement from station to station is, in
effect, a primitive form of DGPS, and if fixes at adjacent stations are taken
within a few minutes of each other, the error in determining the intervening
distance will be of the order of 5 metres or less. (In theory, this will not
work, because corrections for transmission path variations should be made
individually for each individual satellite used, and this cannot be done with
the hand-held instruments currently available. However, if distances and time
intervals between readings are both small, it is likely that the same satellite
constellation will have been used for all estimates and that the atmospheric
changes will also be small.)
 Elevations from hand-held GPS receivers
In some geophysical work, errors of the order of 10 metres may be acceptable
for horizontal co-ordinates but not for elevations, and DGPS is then still
needed. There is a further complication with ‘raw’ GPS elevations, since
these are referenced to an ellipsoid. A national elevation datum is, however,
almost always based on the local position of the geoid via the mean sea level
at some selected port. Differences of several tens of metres between geoid
and ellipsoid are common, and the source of frequent complaints from users
that their instruments never show zero at sea level! In extreme cases, the
difference may exceed 100 m.
Most hand-held instruments give reasonable positional fixes using three
satellites but need four to even attempt an elevation. This is because the
unknown quantities at each fix include the value of the offset between
the instrument’s internal clock and the synchronized clocks of the satellite




constellation. Four unknowns require four measurements. Unfortunately, in
some cases the information as to whether ‘3D navigation’ is being achieved
is not included on the display that shows the co-ordinates (e.g. Figure 1.15),
and the only indication that the fourth satellite has been ‘lost’ may be a
suspicious lack of variation in the elevation reading.

Geophysical Data

Some geophysical readings are of true point data but others are obtained
using sources that are separated from detectors. Where values are determined
between rather than at points, readings will be affected by orientation. Precise
field notes are always important but especially so in these cases, since reading
points must be defined and orientations must be recorded.

If transmitters, receivers and/or electrodes are laid out in straight lines
and the whole system can be reversed without changing the reading, the midpoint
should be considered the reading point. Special notations are needed
for asymmetric systems, and the increased probability of positioning error is
in itself a reason for avoiding asymmetry. Especial care must be taken when
recording the positions of sources and detectors in seismic work.

 Station numbering
Station numbering should be logical and consistent. Where data are collected
along traverses, numbers should define positions in relation to the traverse
grid. Infilling between traverse stations 3 and 4 with stations 3.25  , 3.5 and 3.75
is clumsy and may create typing problems, whereas defining as 325E a
station halfway between stations 300E and 350E, which are 50 metres apart,
is easy and unambiguous. The fashion for labelling such a station 300+25E
has no discernible advantages and uses a plus sign which may be needed,
with digital field systems or in subsequent processing, to stand for N or E. It
may be worth defining the grid origin in such a way that S or W stations do
not occur, and this may be essential with data loggers that cannot cope with
either negatives or points of the compass.
Stations scattered randomly through an area are best numbered sequentially.
Positions can be recorded in the field by pricking through maps or
air-photos and labelling the reverse sides. Estimating coordinates in the field
from maps may seem desirable but mistakes are easily made and valuable
time is lost. Station coordinates are now often obtained from GPS receivers
(Section 1.5), but differential GPS may be needed to provide sufficient accuracy
for detailed surveys.
If several observers are involved in a single survey, numbers can easily
be accidentally duplicated. All field books and sheets should record the name
of the observer. The interpreter or data processor will need to know who to
look for when things go wrong.
Recording results
Geophysical results are primarily numerical and must be recorded even more
carefully than qualitative observations of field geology. Words, although
sometimes difficult to read, can usually be deciphered eventually, but a set of
numbers may be wholly illegible or, even worse, may be misread. The need
for extra care has to be reconciled with the fact that geophysical observers are
usually in more of a hurry than are geologists, since their work may involve
instruments that are subject to drift, draw power from batteries at frightening
speed or are on hire at high daily rates.
Numbers may, of course, not only be misread but miswritten. The circumstances
under which data are recorded in the field are varied but seldom

ideal. Observers are usually either too hot, too cold, too wet or too thirsty.
Under such conditions, they may delete correct results and replace them with
incorrect ones, in moments of confusion or temporary dyslexia. Data on geophysical
field sheets should therefore never be erased. Corrections should
be made by crossing out the incorrect items, preserving their legibility, and
writing the correct values alongside. Something may then be salvaged even
if the correction is wrong. Precise reporting standards must be enforced and
strict routines must be followed if errors are to be minimized. Reading the
instrument twice at each occupation of a station, and recording both values,
reduces the incidence of major errors.
Loss of geophysical data tends to be final. Some of the qualitative observations
in a geological notebook might be remembered and re-recorded, but
not strings of numbers. Copies are therefore essential and should be made
in the field, using duplicating sheets or carbon paper, or by transcribing the
results each evening. Whichever method is used, originals and duplicates
must be separated immediately and stored separately thereafter. Duplication
is useless if copies are stored, and lost, together. This, of course, applies
equally to data stored in a data logger incorporated in, or linked to, the field
instrument. Such data should be checked, and backed up, each evening.
Digital data loggers are usually poorly adapted to storing non-numeric
information, but observers are uniquely placed to note and comment on a
multitude of topographic, geological, manmade (cultural ) and climatic factors
that may affect the geophysical results. If they fail to do so, the data that
they have gathered may be interpreted incorrectly. If data loggers are not
being used, comments should normally be recorded in notebooks, alongside
the readings concerned. If they are being used, adequate supplementary positional
data must be stored elsewhere. In archaeological and site investigation
surveys, where large numbers of readings are taken in very small areas, annotated
sketches are always useful and may be essential. Sketch maps should
be made wherever the distances of survey points or lines from features in
the environment are important. Geophysical field workers may also have a
responsibility to pass on to their geological colleagues information of interest
about places that only they may visit. They should at least be willing to
record dips and strikes, and perhaps to return with rock samples where these
would be useful.
Accuracy, sensitivity, precision
Accuracy must be distinguished from sensitivity. A standard gravity meter,
for example, is sensitive to field changes of one-tenth of a gravity unit
but an equivalent level of accuracy will be achieved only if readings are
carefully made and drift and tidal corrections are correctly applied. Accuracy
is thus limited, but not determined, by instrument sensitivity. Precision,


which is concerned only with the numerical presentation of results (e.g. the
number of decimal places used), should always be appropriate to accuracy
(Example 1.1). Not only does superfluous precision waste time but false conclusions
may be drawn from the high implied accuracy.


Example 1.1
Gravity reading = 858.3 scale units
Calibration constant = 1.0245 g.u. per scale division (see Section 2.1)
Converted reading = 879.32835 g.u.
But reading accuracy is only 0.1 g.u. (approximately), and therefore:
Converted reading = 879.3 g.u.
(Four decimal place precision is needed in the calibration constant, because
858.3 multiplied by 0.0001 is equal to almost 0.1 g.u.)


Geophysical measurements can sometimes be made to a greater accuracy
than is needed, or even usable, by the interpreters. However, the highest
possible accuracy should always be sought, as later advances may allow the
data to be analysed more effectively.
 Drift
A geophysical instrument will usually not record the same results if read
repeatedly at the same place. This may be due to changes in background
field but can also be caused by changes in the instrument itself, i.e. to drift.
Drift correction is often the essential first stage in data analysis, and is usually
based on repeat readings at base stations (Section 1.4).
Instrument drift is often related to temperature and is unlikely to be linear
between two readings taken in the relative cool at the beginning and end of
a day if temperatures are 10 or 20 degrees higher at noon. Survey loops may
therefore have to be limited to periods of only one or two hours.
Drift calculations should be made whilst the field crew is still in the
survey area so that readings may be repeated if the drift-corrected results
appear questionable. Changes in background field are sometimes treated as
drift but in most cases the variations can either be monitored directly (as in
magnetics) or calculated (as in gravity). Where such alternatives exist, it is
preferable they be used, since poor instrument performance may otherwise
be overlooked.
 Signal and noise
To a geophysicist, signal is the object of the survey and noise is anything
else that is measured but is considered to contain no useful information. One
observer’s signal may be another’s noise. The magnetic effect of a buried




normal distribution lie within 1 SD of the mean, and less than 0.3% differ
from it by more than 3 SDs. The SD is popular with contractors when quoting
survey reliability, since a small value can efficiently conceal several major
errors. Geophysical surveys rarely provide enough field data for statistical
methods to be validly applied, and distributions are more often assumed to
be normal than proven to be so.
 Anomalies
Only rarely is a single geophysical observation significant. Usually, many
readings are needed, and regional background levels must be determined,
before interpretation can begin. Interpreters tend to concentrate on anomalies,
i.e. on differences from a constant or smoothly varying background.
Geophysical anomalies take many forms. A massive sulphide deposit containing
pyrrhotite would be dense, magnetic and electrically conductive. Typical
anomaly profiles recorded over such a body by various types of geophysical
survey are shown in Figure 1.8. A wide variety of possible contour patterns
correspond to these differently shaped profiles.
Background fields also vary and may, at different scales, be regarded as
anomalous. A ‘mineralization’ gravity anomaly, for example, might lie on
a broader high due to a mass of basic rock. Separation of regionals from
residuals is an important part of geophysical data processing and even in the
field it may be necessary to estimate background so that the significance of
local anomalies can be assessed. On profiles, background fields estimated by
eye may be more reliable than those obtained using a computer, because of
the virtual impossibility of writing a computer program that will produce a
background field uninfluenced by the anomalous values (Figure 1.9). Computer
methods are, however, essential when deriving backgrounds from data
gathered over an area rather than along a single line.
The existence of an anomaly indicates a difference between the real world
and some simple model, and in gravity work the terms free air, Bouguer
and isostatic anomaly are commonly used to denote derived quantities that
represent differences from gross Earth models. These so-called anomalies
are sometimes almost constant within a small survey area, i.e. the area is
not anomalous! Use of terms such as Bouguer gravity (rather than Bouguer
anomaly) avoids this confusion.
 Wavelengths and half-widths
Geophysical anomalies in profile often resemble transient waves but vary
in space rather than time. In describing them the terms frequency and frequency
content are often loosely used, although wavenumber (the number of
complete waves in unit distance) is pedantically correct. Wavelength may be
quite properly used of a spatially varying quantity, but is imprecise where




geophysical anomalies are concerned because an anomaly described as having
a single ‘wavelength’ would be resolved by Fourier analysis into a number
of components of different wavelengths.
A more easily estimated quantity is the half-width, which is equal to half
the distance between the points at which the amplitude has fallen to half the
anomaly maximum (cf. Figure 1.8a). This is roughly equal to a quarter of
the wavelength of the dominant sinusoidal component, but has the advantage
of being directly measurable on field data. Wavelengths and half-widths are
important because they are related to the depths of sources. Other things
being equal, the deeper the source, the broader the anomaly.
 Presentation of results
The results of surveys along traverse lines can be presented in profile form,
as in Figure 1.8. It is usually possible to plot profiles in the field, or at
least each evening, as work progresses, and such plots are vital for quality
control. A laptop computer can reduce the work involved, and many modern
instruments and data loggers are programmed to display profiles in ‘real time’
as work proceeds.
A traverse line drawn on a topographic map can be used as the baseline
for a geophysical profile. This type of presentation is particularly helpful
in identifying anomalies due to manmade features, since correlations with
features such as roads and field boundaries are obvious. If profiles along a
number of different traverses are plotted in this way on a single map they are

said to be stacked, a word otherwise used for the addition of multiple data
sets to form a single output set (see Section 1.3.5).
Contour maps used to be drawn in the field only if the strike of some
feature had to be defined quickly so that infill work could be planned, but
once again the routine use of laptop computers has vastly reduced the work
involved. However, information is lost in contouring because it is not generally
possible to choose a contour interval that faithfully records all the features
of the original data. Also, contour lines are drawn in the areas between traverses,
where there are no data, and inevitably introduce a form of noise.
Examination of contour patterns is not, therefore, the complete answer to
field quality control.
Cross-sectional contour maps (pseudo-sections) are described in
Sections 6.3.5 and 7.4.2.
In engineering site surveys, pollution monitoring and archaeology, the
objects of interest are generally close to the surface and their positions in
plan are usually much more important than their depths. They are, moreover,
likely to be small and to produce anomalies detectable only over very small
areas. Data have therefore to be collected on very closely spaced grids and can
often be presented most effectively if background-adjusted values are used
to determine the colour or grey-scale shades of picture elements (pixels) that
can be manipulated by image-processing techniques. Interpretation then relies
on pattern recognition and a single pixel value is seldom important. Noise
is eliminated by eye, i.e. patterns such as those in Figure 1.10 are easily
recognized as due to human activity.



 Data loggers
During the past decade, automation of geophysical equipment in small-scale
surveys has progressed from a rarity to a fact of life. Although many of the
older types of instrument are still in use, and giving valuable service, they now
compete with variants containing the sort of computer power employed, 30
years ago, to put a man on the moon. At least one manufacturer now proudly
boasts ‘no notebook’, even though the instrument in question is equipped
with only a numerical key pad so that there is no possibility of entering
text comments into the (more than ample) memory. On other automated
instruments the data display is so small and so poorly positioned that the
possibility that the observer might actually want to look at, and even think
about, his observations as he collects them has clearly not been considered.
Unfortunately, this pessimism may all too often be justified, partly because of
the speed with which readings, even when in principle discontinuous, can now
be taken and logged. Quality control thus often depends on the subsequent
playback and display of whole sets of data, and it is absolutely essential that
this is done on, at the most, a daily basis. As Oscar Wilde might have said
(had he opted for a career in field geophysics), to spend a few hours recording
rubbish might be accounted a misfortune. To spend anything more than a day
doing so looks suspiciously like carelessness.
Automatic data loggers, whether ‘built-in’ or separate, are particularly
useful where instruments can be dragged, pushed or carried along traverse
to provide virtually continuous readings. Often, all that is required of the
operators is that they press a key to initiate the reading process, walk along
the traverse at constant speed and press the key again when the traverse is
completed. On lines more than about 20 m long, additional keystrokes can
be used to ‘mark’ intermediate survey points.
One consequence of continuous recording has been the appearance in
ground surveys of errors of types once common in airborne surveys which
have now been almost eliminated by improved compensation methods and
GPS navigation. These were broadly divided into parallax errors, heading
errors, ground clearance/coupling errors and errors due to speed variations.
With the system shown in Figure 1.11, parallax errors can occur because
the magnetic sensor is about a metre ahead of the GPS sensor. Similar errors
can occur in surveys where positions are recorded by key strokes on a data
logger. If the key is depressed by the operator when he, rather than the sensor,
passes a survey peg, all readings will be displaced from their true positions.
If, as is normal practice, alternate lines on the grid are traversed in opposite
directions, a herringbone pattern will be imposed on a linear anomaly, with
the position of the peak fluctuating backwards and forwards according to the
direction in which the operator was walking (Figure 1.12a).


False anomalies can also be produced in airborne surveys if ground
clearance is allowed to vary, and similar effects can now be observed in
ground surveys. Keeping the sensor shown in Figure 1.11 at a constant height
above the ground is not easy (although a light flexible ‘spacer’ hanging from
it can help). On level ground there tends to be a rhythmic effect associated
with the operator’s motion, and this can sometimes appear on contour maps
as ‘striping’ at right angles to the traverse when minor peaks and troughs on
adjacent lines are linked to each other by the contouring algorithm. On slopes
there will, inevitably, be a tendency for a sensor in front of the observer to
be closer to the ground when going uphill than when going down. How
this will affect the final maps will vary with the nature of the terrain, but
in an area with constant slope there will a tendency for background levels
to be different on parallel lines traversed in opposite directions. This can
produce herringbone effects on individual contour lines in low gradient areas
(Figure 1.12b).
Heading errors occurred in airborne (especially aeromagnetic) surveys
because the effect of the aircraft on the sensor depended on aircraft orientation.



A similar effect can occur in a ground magnetic survey if the observer is
carrying any iron or steel material. The induced magnetization in these objects
will vary according to the facing direction, producing effects similar to those
produced by constant slopes, i.e. similar to those in Figure 1.12b.
Before the introduction of GPS navigation, flight path recovery in airborne
surveys relied on interpolation between points identified photographically.
Necessarily, ground speed was assumed constant between these points, and
anomalies were displaced if this was not the case. Similar effects can now be
seen in datalogged ground surveys. Particularly common reasons for slight
displacements of anomalies are that the observer either presses the key to start
recording at the start of the traverse, and then starts walking or, at the end of
the traverse, stops walking and only then presses the key to stop recording.
These effects can be avoided by insisting that observers begin walking before
the start of the traverse and continue walking until the end point has been

safely passed. If, however, speed changes are due to rugged ground, all that
can be done is to increase the number of ‘marked’ points.
Many data loggers not only record data but have screens large enough
to show individual and multiple profiles, allowing a considerable degree of
quality control in the field. Further quality control will normally be done each
evening, using automatic contouring programs on laptop PCs, but allowance
must be made for the fact that automatic contouring programs tend to introduce
their own distortions (Figure 1.12c).

Geophysical Fieldwork

Geophysical instruments vary widely in size and complexity but all are used
to make physical measurements, of the sort commonly made in laboratories, at
temporary sites in sometimes hostile conditions. They should be economical
in power use, portable, rugged, reliable and simple. These criteria are satisfied
to varying extents by the commercial equipment currently available.
 Choosing geophysical instruments
Few instrument designers can have tried using their own products for long
periods in the field, since operator comfort seldom seems to have been
considered. Moreover, although many real improvements have been made
in the last 30 years, design features have been introduced during the same
period, for no obvious reasons, that have actually made fieldwork more difficult.
The proton magnetometer staff, discussed below, is a case in point.
If different instruments can, in principle, do the same job to the same
standards, practical considerations become paramount. Some of these are
listed below.
Serviceability: Is the manual comprehensive and comprehensible? Is a
breakdown likely to be repairable in the field? Are there facilities for repairing
major failures in the country of use or would the instrument have to be sent
overseas, risking long delays en route and in customs? Reliability is vital but
some manufacturers seem to use their customers to evaluate prototypes.
Power supplies: If dry batteries are used, are they of types easy to replace
or will they be impossible to find outside major cities? If rechargeable batteries
are used, how heavy are they? In either case, how long will the batteries
last at the temperatures expected in the field? Note that battery life is reduced
in cold climates. The reduction can be dramatic if one of the functions of the
battery is to keep the instrument at a constant temperature.
Data displays: Are these clearly legible under all circumstances? A torch
is needed to read some in poor light and others are almost invisible in
bright sunlight. Large displays used to show continuous traces or profiles
can exhaust power supplies very quickly.
Hard copy: If hard copy records can be produced directly from the field
instrument, are they of adequate quality? Are they truly permanent, or will
they become illegible if they get wet, are abraded or are exposed to sunlight?
Comfort: Is prolonged use likely to cripple the operator? Some instruments
are designed to be suspended on a strap passing across the back of
the neck. This is tiring under any circumstances and can cause serious medical
problems if the instrument has to be levelled by bracing it against the
strap. Passing the strap over one shoulder and under the other arm may
reduce the strain but not all instruments are easy to use when carried in
this way.
Convenience: If the instrument is placed on the ground, will it stand
upright? Is the cable then long enough to reach the sensor in its normal
operating position? If the sensor is mounted on a tripod or pole, is this strong
enough? The traditional proton magnetometer poles, in sections that screwed
together and ended in spikes that could be stuck into soft ground, have now
been largely replaced by unspiked hinged rods that are more awkward to
stow away, much more fragile (the hinges can twist and break), can only be
used if fully extended and must be supported at all times.
Fieldworthiness: Are the control knobs and connectors protected from
accidental impact? Is the casing truly waterproof? Does protection from damp
grass depend on the instrument being set down in a certain way? Are there
depressions on the console where moisture will collect and then inevitably
seep inside?
Automation: Computer control has been introduced into almost all the
instruments in current production (although older, less sophisticated models
are still in common use). Switches have almost vanished, and every instruction
has to be entered via a keypad. This has reduced the problems that
used to be caused by electrical spikes generated by switches but, because the
settings are often not permanently visible, unsuitable values may be repeatedly
used in error. Moreover, simple operations have sometimes been made
unduly complicated by the need to access nested menus. Some instruments
do not allow readings to be taken until line and station numbers have been
entered and some even demand to know the distance to the next station and
to the next line!
The computer revolution has produced real advances in field geophysics,
but it has its drawbacks. Most notably, the ability to store data digitally in
data loggers has discouraged the making of notes on field conditions where
these, however important, do not fall within the restricted range of options
the logger provides. This problem is further discussed in Section 1.3.2. 
 Cables
Almost all geophysical work involves cables, which may be short, linking
instruments to sensors or batteries, or hundreds of metres long. Electrical
induction between cables (electromagnetic coupling, also known as crosstalk
) can be a serious source of noise (see also Section 11.3.5).
Efficiency in cable handling is an absolute necessity. Long cables always
tend to become tangled, often because of well-intentioned attempts to make
neat coils using hand and elbow. Figures of eight are better than simple loops,
but even so it takes an expert to construct a coil from which cable can be
run freely once it has been removed from the arm. On the other hand, a
seemingly chaotic pile of wire spread loosely on the ground can be quite
trouble-free. The basic rule is that cable must be fed on and off the pile in
opposite directions, i.e. the last bit of cable fed on must be the first to be
pulled off. Any attempts to pull cable from the bottom will almost certainly
end in disaster.
Cable piles are also unlikely to cause the permanent kinks which are often
features of neat and tidy coils and which may have to be removed by allowing
the cable to hang freely and untwist naturally. Places where this is possible
with 100-metre lengths are rare.
Piles can be made portable by feeding cables into open boxes, and on
many seismic surveys the shot-firers carried their firing lines in this way in
old gelignite boxes. Ideally, however, if cables are to be carried from place
to place, they should be wound on properly designed drums. Even then,
problems can occur. If cable is unwound by pulling on its free end, the drum
will not stop simply because the pull stops, and a free-running drum is an
effective, but untidy, knitting machine.
A drum carried as a back-pack should have an efficient brake and should
be reversible so that it can be carried across the chest and be wound from
a standing position. Some drums sold with geophysical instruments combine
total impracticality with inordinate expense and are inferior to home-made or
garden-centre versions.
Geophysical lines exert an almost hypnotic influence on livestock. Cattle
have been known to desert lush pastures in favour of midnight treks through
hedges and across ditches in search of juicy cables. Not only can a survey be
delayed but a valuable animal may be killed by biting into a live conductor,
and constant vigilance is essential.
 Connections
Crocodile clips are usually adequate for electrical connections between single
conductors. Heavy plugs must be used for multi-conductor connections and
are usually the weakest links in the entire field system. They should be
placed on the ground very gently and as seldom as possible and, if they do
not have screw-on caps, be protected with plastic bags or ‘clingfilm’. They
must be shielded from grit as well as moisture. Faults are often caused by dirt
increasing wear on the contacts in socket units, which are almost impossible
to clean.
Plugs should be clamped to their cables, since any strain will otherwise
be borne by the weak soldered connections to the individual pins. Inevitably,
the cables are flexed repeatedly just beyond the clamps, and wires may break
within the insulated sleeving at these points. Any break there, or a broken or
dry joint inside the plug, means work with a soldering iron. This is never easy
when connector pins are clotted with old solder, and is especially difficult if
many wires crowd into a single plug.
Problems with plugs can be minimized by ensuring that, when moving,
they are always carried, never dragged along the ground. Two hands should
always be used, one holding the cable to take the strain of any sudden pull,
the other to support the plug itself. The rate at which cable is reeled in should
never exceed a comfortable walking pace, and especial care is needed when
the last few metres are being wound on to a drum. Drums should be fitted
with clips or sockets where the plugs can be secured when not in use.
 Geophysics in the rain
A geophysicist, huddled over his instruments, is a sitting target for rain, hail,
snow and dust, as well as mosquitoes, snakes and dogs. His most useful piece

of field clothing is often a large waterproof cape which he can not only wrap
around himself but into which he can retreat, along with his instruments, to
continue work .
Electrical methods that rely on direct or close contact with the ground
generally do not work in the rain, and heavy rain can be a source of seismic
noise. Other types of survey can continue, since most geophysical instruments
are supposed to be waterproof and some actually are. However, unless
dry weather can be guaranteed, a field party should be plentifully supplied
with plastic bags and sheeting to protect instruments, and paper towels for
drying them. Large transparent plastic bags can often be used to enclose
instruments completely while they are being used, but even then condensation
may create new conductive paths, leading to drift and erratic behaviour.
Silica gel within instruments can absorb minor traces of moisture but cannot
cope with large amounts, and a portable hair-drier held at the base camp may
be invaluable.
 A geophysical toolkit
Regardless of the specific type of geophysical survey, similar tools are likely
to be needed. A field toolkit should include the following:
• Long-nose pliers (the longer and thinner the better)
• Slot-head screwdrivers (one very fine, one normal)
• Phillips screwdriver
• Allen keys (metric and imperial)
• Scalpels (light, expendable types are best)
• Wire cutters/strippers
• Electrical contact cleaner (spray)
• Fine-point 12V soldering iron
• Solder and ‘Solder-sucker’
• Multimeter (mainly for continuity and battery checks, so small size and
durability are more important than high sensitivity)
• Torch (preferably of a type that will stand unsupported and double as a
table lamp. A ‘head torch’ can be very useful)
• Hand lens
• Insulating tape, preferably self-amalgamating
• Strong epoxy glue/‘super-glue’
• Silicone grease
• Waterproof sealing compound
• Spare insulated and bare wire, and connectors
• Spare insulating sleeving
• Kitchen cloths and paper towels
• Plastic bags and ‘clingfilm’
A comprehensive first-aid kit is equally vital.