Chapter I : Drilling the Pay, Selecting the Interval and the Initial Design con't lec ( 5 )

Coiled Tubing Drilling

In addition to jointed pipe drilling, coiled tubing (see Chapter 18 for Coiled Tubing quipment and Techniques) can also be used for drilling and milling in some applications. Coiled tubing offers several advantages and a few current disadvantages that should be explored for their potential in completions and workovers. One of the best uses of coiled tubing drilling may be in combination with underbalanced drilling “where the well is allowed to flow during the drilling operation.”
The simplest coiled tubing drilling bottomhole assembly (BHA) includes a bit, mud motor, stabilizers or collars, the connector and the coil. The abilities of coiled tubing for drilling include a continuously fed fluid transfer mechanism (the coil) with no tool joints. This one feature allows the smooth external wall that can be sealed very easily at the surface. Fluids returning from downhole up the annular area are vented under pressure to surface separation equipment and small kicks and gases can be handled easily.
In many of the first examples of coiled tubing milling and drilling, the mud motors which provide turning ability at bit often stalled or stopped turning because of excess loads placed on the bits from either the string or the bottomhole assembly. This reoccurring motor stalling problem resulted in very slow penetration. Motor stalls typically occur when downward forces (weight and force) at the bit are greater than the ability of the motor to turn the bit. There are a number of reasons for motor stalls.
      1. Too aggressive a bit or mill design will require excessive power to turn. Less aggressive (smaller teeth) milled and bits are easier to turn, although they may drill some materials slightly slower.
      2. Coiled tubing milling and drilling typically uses smaller motors with less torque. The smaller motor design utilizes very small clearances and small loaders and stators in the mud motors.
      3. In deviated wells, trying to apply force on coiled tubing from the surface may result in first sinusoidal and then helical buckling. When buckling occurs, regardless of its location in the wellbore, the stored energy will try to work its way either up or down and add an extra force against the bit the surface unit.
      4. The injector feed control at the surface is often a major source of the problem. The injector is a source of all upward and downward force exclusive of drill collars and other weight. Ideally, the feed of the coiled tubing through the injector should be no faster than the penetration through the bit or mill. If too much tubing runs through the injector at any time, the total force on the bit increases and a motor stall may occur. For best results, very slow speed or micro movement of the injector head should be possible in any unit used for coiled tubing drilling.

Underbalanced Drilling

Traditionally the main goal of any drilling operation was to keep control of the well. This resulted in a positive pressure from the wellbore outward into the formation stopping the inward flow of all reservoir fluids. Underbalanced drilling with a pressure contained system allows the formation fluids to flow into the wellbore and prevents invasion of the drilling fluids into the formation. Although this method is more difficult to handle with its increasing amount of fluid recovery, it does provide the very best method of damage-free drilling. The elements of an underbalanced drilling system include a contained, safe, surface system that can separate solids, liquids and gases. This type of a separator system generally uses solid separation equipment and a horizontal separator to separate liquids and gases. Other important aspects of underbalanced drilling include adequate hydraulics of the fluid circulation system to allow bit lubrication, cooling and hole cleaning, plus sufficient pressure in the wellbore to prevent full-scale hole unloading. Typically, underbalanced drilling attempts to maintain from 112-2 Ib per gal under the pore pressure. Depending on the permeability of the formation and the type of fluids flowing, the pressure might have to be adjusted to keep the solid separation facilities within their reasonable operating limits.

Slimholes

Slimhole drilling has become a popular concept in recent years. Although smaller diameter holes are theoretically cheaper to drill because less formation is actually removed, they are not always a cheaper hole to drill. Cost of drilling involves not only the time to cut through a part of the formation, but also involves the use of existing (paid for) versus new and smaller equipment, and several other factors including pressure control and the cost of the completion. Many times it has been found that drilling a smaller hole actually costs more than drilling a traditional hole where costs of normal sized equipments was very cheap in comparison to special ordered newer and smaller equipment. Pressure control during drilling or workovers in small wellbores is often very difficult. An example, shown in Chapter 15 on workover fluids and control, shows that the volume of a 1 bbl kick in a small
diameter (3-3/4 in. hole) versus a large diameter hole (9-112 in.) may result in several hundred psi difference just from the volume of the hole filled by the 1 bbl kick. When drilling or working over holes with small diameters, accurate trip tanks and a functional alarm system must be used to minimize danger from kicks.

Initial Completion Design

Selecting the Pay Zone
Selecting the pay and deciding where to place the wellbore are two of the most important pieces of engineering that most occur in the completion process. Many rocks from shales to fractured granites contain hydrocarbons, but, not every rock type or reservoir can qualify as a pay zone. Selection of the pay breaks down into several basic considerations:

1-Prospect development economics,
2-porosity and permeability requirements,
3-hydrocarbon type and saturation requirements,
4-recoverable hydrocarbon volumes (by primary, secondary and tertiary methods),
5-pressure support,
6-reservoir stability,
7-recognition of compartmentalization,
8-availability of technology to cost effectively produce the reserves,
9-ability to plug and abandon the reservoir,
10-environmental and other risks.

The economics of a project depend simply on whether enough money can be made from sale of the productive hydrocarbons in a limited amount of time to offset the total costs of the project. The associated cost of the project may include a variety of finding, development, production and abandonment costs. Among these costs are: prospect leasing, field development, field operation, royalties, interests on the money used,
profit, risks, plug and abandonment costs and contingency funds for all matters problems such as blowouts and cleanup operations. Substantial deposits of crude oil and gas are known in many parts of the world, bu cannot be currently produced because the production rates cannot offset the cost of development and operation. Every year many of these (outer limit) deposits are being brought on-line as producing reservoirs as technology is being developed or the cost of development drops through other factors. Even the cost of
Deepwater developments, for example, which can be in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars can be economic if risk can be reduced and if the production rate from the wells is high. Every project from the shallowest stripper well at 2 bpd to the 100 mmscf/d or 30,000 bpd oil wells must be judged by some risks versus cost recovery and profit factor.
Porosity and permeability are the reservoir storage and pathway of flowing fluids. Porosity is the void space between the grains in which fluids can be stored. Permeability is a measurement of the ability of fluids to flow through the formation. Rocksuch as shales and chalk, for example, may have extremely high porosities approaching 30-40 percent, but the porosity is not linked together, thus the permeability is very low. On the other hand, naturally fractured formations may have extremely high permeabilities approaching tens of darcies
in some cases, but have very low porosity, often only 4-6 percent. The amount of porosity and permeability necessary for a project depends on the production rate needs, although, operations such as hydraulic fracturing can increase the production rate of a well by a factor of 2 to 10 or more. Fracturing alone may not make the project economic. The economics of a project are such that every factor must be weighed in turn in the economic justification and critical factors, such as hydrocarbon storage and the permeable pathway, must be available before even a huge reservoir with billions of barrels of oil can be made productive. In reservoir selection, often times a porosity or permeability cutoff is used for pay versus nonpay identification. Recognition of this level from porosity logs and flow tests are often critical in establishing minimum pay requirements.
Hydrocarbon type and saturation determine the amount of hydrocarbons that may occupy the pore space of a reservoir. Many factors such as moveable versus irreducible saturations and changing factors such as relative permeability can make the saturation and permeability values “moving targets.” There are no set minimum values for hydrocarbon saturation, however, the best parts of the reservoir will usually have the higher values of hydrocarbon saturation. Saturation of water may also be a key in pay identification. Extremely high saturations of water may indicate hydrocarbon depletion or movement of an aquifer into the
Pay.
The recoverable hydrocarbon volumes are usually calculated form the measured values of porosity and saturation. Oil in place quantities do not indicate that all of that oil can be recovered. The porosity of a formation varies from very large pores to very small pores and the oil in very small pores often will not flow from the small capillaries even under very high depletion pressures. How much oil will flow from a rock is dependent on the size of the pore spaces, the oil saturation and type and the amount of energy available to push the
oil towards the wellbore. Recoverable hydrocarbon estimates may vary many percentage points from what reality shows later on. The differences many times are in how well the pressure supports the drive mechanism in producing the fluids.
The pressures in the reservoir dictate how much fluid will ultimately be recovered. Many different types of pressure supports are available. The typical pressure support mechanisms include bottom and edgewater drives, gas cap drives, volumetric depletion and other pressure sources such as reservoir compaction and other factors. Each of these pressure support mechanisms has advantages and disadvantages to deciding recovery in a reservoir. Among the most effective types of reservoir pressure support are the bottom and
edgewater drives. These systems may maintain pressure at initial values clear to the end of the project. The problems with them is they may produce large amounts of water along with the oil. Volumetric depletion is usually found in a sealed reservoir and then the reservoir may deplete without producing any water. The recovery, however, from this types of reservoir is extremely low, since reservoir energy bleeds off very quickly. Pressure support can be added, in some cases, by the use of water floods, gas repressurization or
other types of pressure maintenance such as tertiary floods. When factors such as bottomwater or edgewater drive are recognized early, the location of the wellbores can be selected to take advantage of flow paths of the drive fluids and recoveries can be enhanced.
Reservoir stability is an issue which may effect the initial completion or repairs or recompletions throughout the life of the reservoir. Many geologically young formations lack sufficient strength for formation coherency during all phases of production. Recognition of this stability issue is usually easy because of rapid drilling rates, sand strength issues in the wellbore or other factors. The decision on adding a stabilizing completion
is usually made after consideration from initial flow tests and other factors. The most common methods of include resign consolidation or production rate restriction to avoid sanding. Recognition of compartmentalization is probably one of the most important factors in the initial design of well completions for a project. Compartmentalization is the division of a reservoir into partial or fully pressure isolated compartments by faults, permeability or porosity pinchouts, folding, shale streaks, barriers or other factors. When  compartmentalization is recognized, the location and type of wellbores can be selected to
efficiently drain the compartments and to take advantage of fluid flow patterns within the reservoir. Many of the failures of even large fields can be traced to a failure to recognize compartmentalization during the early development steps in the reservoir. The availability of technology to produce the reserves is an area which keeps the oil industry active in
research and development. Technology such as water flooding, hydraulic fracturing, artificial lift, cold flow of heavy oils, coal degassification and many other projects have increased the worlds recoverable hydrocarbons and continue to be a critical part of meeting the worlds energy needs. When the reservoir flow patterns and other factors are understood, technology can often be developed within a moderate time frame to meet needs in specialized reservoirs. The ability to produce hydrocarbons should never outstrip the ability to control the flow or the ability to plug an abandoned reservoir. Plug and abandonment intentions must take into account that the reservoir should be left in as good a condition as possible for potential tertiary operations that may recover even more fluids. Plug and abandonment costs can be a significant amount of the project cost. Offshore plug and abandonment of fields may reach over 100 million dollars. There are many associated risks, both political and environmental in developing and producing a hydrocarbon depositry. These risks must be taken into account during the economic justification for the reservoir and should offer as good a solution as is possible to the legitimate concerns posed in any situation. Once the values are known, selection of the pay can begin. The selection process uses a number of pieces of information gathered by electronics and other factors.
The objectives in this chapter will be to establish ground rules about what general completion mechanisms have the best fit to the reservoir potential.
Completion design is a function of reservoir characteristics. The problem is that reservoir data, particularly the design sensitive data such as permeability, porosity, saturations, pressure, barriers and longevity, are only fully available after most of the wells in the field have been drilled, completed and tested. In many cases, after initial drilling and completion, reservoir barriers are finally recognized and extreme redrilling or stimulations are needed to process the reservoir. The key to a good initial completion is to collect and assess the data at the earliest possible time, to allow the best early choice of completion.
Successful completions recognize the flow characteristics of the reservoir. There are a number of completion possibilities; each with a limited “fit” to the reservoir properties. The following is a general listing of the completion types with a few of the reservoir variables. The numbers for most variables are typical but only general estimates.

Vertical well

open hole

natural completion

High permeability (Kh 2 10 md for oil, 1 1 md for gas) stable formation (no movement or spalling) no bottom or edge water drives low KJK, c 0.5 KH) (or deviated wells not considered possible) no fracture plannedlpossible, no limits on surface reservoir access
laminations not “frequent.”

Special considerations:

1. Steeply tilting pay: examine hydrocarbon and water fluid flow path to wellbore including effects of K, and KH. Also investigate fracture growth and path. May choose uphill horizontal wellbore to go after “attic” or up-dip reserves that are above vertical well contact.
2. High permeability “streaks”: The size and permeability contrast to the reservoir location with respect to oil/water contact can significantly affect production or water break through. Orientation of the well path or decision to frac may be affected.
3. Salt or techtonic forces: Salt Ylow” may produce extreme loads on casing. The normal approach requires concentric dual casing strings with annular spaces cemented. Techtonic forces, and some horizontal collapse forces may create point loads on the casing which are better handled by extremely heavy wall casing strings.
4. Sweep/Floods: Well placement to process a reservoir uses the permeability pathways for best advantage. Wellbore location, orientation and deviation may be influenced.
5. Fluid Requirements: Heavy oil, scaling, organic precipitation, chronic emulsions, bubble and dew points and other special requirements may make completion compromises or redesigns necessary.
6. Multiple Zones: multiple zones completions and independent completions may be required by pressure, fluid or royalty owners.
7. The initial design is the starting place for the completion, however, it should never be construed to be unchangable. Flexibility is required for any completion to take advantage of information that can be obtained from drilling or other sources.

Concepts in Crop Rotations

1. Introduction
1.1 Crop rotations – A historical perspective

Crop rotation is the production of different economically important plant species in
recurrent succession on a particular field or group of fields. It is an agricultural practice that
has been followed at least since the Middle Ages. During the rule of Charlemagne crop
rotation was vital to much of Europe which at that time followed a two-field rotation of
seeding one field one year with a crop and leaving another fallow. The following year the
fields were reversed (Butt, 2002). Sometime during the Carolingian period the three-field
rotation system was introduced. It consisted of planting one field, usually with a winter
cereal, a second with a summer annual legume, and leaving a third field fallow. The
following year a switch would occur. Sometime during the 17th and /or 18th centuries it was
discovered that planting a legume in the field coming out of fallow of the three-field rotation
would increase fodder for livestock and improve land quality, which was later found to be
due to increased levels of available soil nitrogen (N). During the 16th century Charles
Townshend 2nd Viscount Townshend (aka Turnip Townshend) introduced the four-field
concept of crop rotation to the Waasland region of England (Ashton, 1948). This system,
which consisted of a root crop (turnips (Brassica rapa var. rapa)), wheat (Triticum aestivum
L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and clover (Trifolium spp.) followed by fallow. Every third
year introduced a fodder crop and grazing crop into the system, allowing livestock
production the year-round and thus increased overall agriculture production. Our present
day systems of crop rotation have their beginnings traceable to the Norfolk four-year
system, developed in Norfolk County England around 1730 (Martin, et al., 1976). This
system was similar to that developed by Townshend except barley followed turnips, clover
was seeded for the third year and finally wheat on the fourth year. The field would then be
seeded to turnips again with no fallow year being part of the rotation.
In the new world, prior to the arrival of European settlers, the indigenous people in what is
now the Northeastern United States, practiced slash-and-burn agriculture combined with
fishing, hunting, and gathering (Lyng, 2011). Fields were moved often as the soil would
become depleted and despite the tale of Native Americans teaching the European settlers to
put a fish into the corn hills at planting, there is little or no evidence of the aboriginal people
fertilizing their crops. Maize would be planted in hills using crude wooden hoes with
gourds and beans (Phaseolus spp. L.) being planting alongside and allowed to climb the
maize stalks. When an area would become depleted of plant nutrients, it would be
abandoned and over time, would recover its natural fertility. Lyng (2011), describes the
Native Americans of the northeast as not so much conscience ecologist but rather people
with a strong sense of dependences on nature minus the pressure to provide for consumer
demands. Plains Indians on the other hand are classified as being of two cultures. There
were the nomadic nations that followed the herds of bison that roamed the region and lived
mainly on a diet of bison meat and what they might gather in the way of wild berries, fruits,
and nuts with very little farming except for some maize and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.).
There were then the nations that lived on a combination of meat and crops they would raise.
These peoples tended to live in established villages and would fish, hunt, and gather wild
fruit and berries. The crop farming they practiced again, were maize, beans, and squash
(Cucubina spp. L.), sometimes referred to as “The Three Sisters” in Native American society
(Vivian, 2001). As with the nations in what would become the northeastern United States,
the Plains Indians that practiced crop farming would usually clear their garden areas by
slash and burn, grow their crops, and then allow a two-year fallow before planting again.
Just prior to planting, some villages would carry in brush and other plant debris to burn
along with the refuge that grew in the field during fallow to “enrich” the soil for the crops
about to be planted.
The early European settlers attempted to raise those crops (wheat, and rye (Secale cereal L.))
which they were accustom to, using cultivation methods they had used in the old country.
They also, introduced livestock, (cattle, swine, and sheep) which were not found in the New
World but that had been a major source of food for them in their native homeland. They
soon discovered that clearing fields for planting and pasturing was an arduous task and in
order to survive adopted some of the crop production techniques practiced by the
indigenous peoples and allowed their livestock to forage open-range (Lyng, 2011). As
colonization expanded and available labor increased along with the demand for food, the
permanent clearing of arable land increased along with the introduction of more Old World
crops and, unfortunately, their pests that continue to demand time and financial resources
to contain today.
The first export from the American colonies to England was tobacco. Though not a food
crop, tobacco played a pivotal role in helping sustain the Jamestown colony and gave the
settlers something to exchange for necessary items to survive. Tobacco is a high cash value,
very labor intensive crop. Even as of 2002, with only about 57,000 total farms in the United
States being classed as tobacco farms producing an average of 3 hectares of the crop per
farm, the average cash value of those 3 hectares was nearly $42,000 (Capehart, 2004).
Though tobacco preserved the Virginia colony, within seven years of its cultivation and
export, its continued production in the New World would usher in the African slave trade,
the darkest part of America’s past, and would culminate 200 years later into the American
Civil War.
Prior to colonization, a species of cotton, Gossypium barbadense, was being grown by the
indigenous people of the New World (West, 2004). Columbus received gifts from the
Arawaks of balls of cotton thread upon making landfall in 1492. Egyptian cotton (G.
hirsutum L.) was introduced to the colonies as early as 1607 by the Virginia Company in an
attempt to encourage its production and help satisfy the European appetite for the fiber that
was currently being exported from India . However, tobacco production and the lucrative
prices being paid for it along with the belief that cotton depleted the soil and required too
much hand labor, dissuaded the colonist from planting the crop. Even encouragement from
the colonial Governors, William Berkley and Edmund Andors could not convince the
settlers to switch to cotton. Small hectarages of G. hirsutum L. though were grown along the
Mid Atlantic colonies for individual household use. The Revolutionary War halted imports
of large quantities of cotton to the former colonies from Britain and forced the Americans to
grow their own supply. By the mid 1780’s production had expanded and the newly formed
United States became a net exporter of cotton to Britain.
After the development of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 the key to financial success
in the southern states was acquiring large hectares of land for cotton production and large
numbers of slaves to tend to the crop. Maize, small grains, forages, and food crops were
grown only in sufficient quantities to sustain the plantations that had developed. These
crops were not grown for the purpose of commerce and were often relegated to some of the
marginal lands on the plantation or near the homestead for convenient harvest. The bulk of
all cleared fields were devoted to production of tobacco or “King Cotton” as it would
become known. From 1800 to 1830 cotton went from making up 7% ($5 million) of exports
from the United States to 41% ($30 million) (West, 2004). Tobacco production went from
45.4 million kg at the outbreak of the Revolutionary War to 175.8 million kg prior to the
Civil War (Jacobstein, 1907). Crop rotation was not even considered an option with respect
to these crops due to the cash value paid for them. By 1835 the top soil of eastern Georgia
had eroded away with the remaining clay unsuitable for cotton production. As soils became
depleted of nutrients necessary for the crops’ production, more wilderness, particularly
further west would be cleared and farmed. This resulted in conflicts with the native peoples
that resulted in their forced resettlement onto reservations and the spread of slavery
westward into newly chartered states in the south. This further deepened political and
economic conflicts that would explode into the American Civil War.
1.2 Advent of agricultural education and research
The Morrill Act of 1862 and again 1892 established the American Land-Grant colleges in
each state and charged them with the responsibility of teaching the agricultural and
mechanical disciplines, along with other responsibilities necessary to an advanced
education. The Hatch Act of 1887 then established the Agriculture Experiment Station
system which, in most states, is administered by the Land-Grant Universities and was to
provide further enhancement of agricultural teaching through experimentation. In 1914 the
Smith-Lever Act established the State Cooperative Extension Service which disseminates
information to the public of advances in agriculture production discovered by the state
agricultural experiment stations. All three of these legislative acts came about because of a
need to better understand sound farm management practices, including crop rotations, to
improve the nation’s farm economy.
The concept of agriculture research stations was not an American idea. The Rothamsted
Experiment Station in the United Kingdom is said to be the world’s oldest, being established
in 1843, while Möcken station in Germany, established in 1850, is said to be the world’s
oldest state supported agricultural research station. Agricultural research stations can now
be found in most all developed countries and even many less developed nations. Research
on crop rotations has been and continues to be conducted at virtually all of these stations,
with specialization towards the environment and crop species indigenous to their location.
Some of these studies have been in existence since the late 19th century (Rothamsted, 2011).
Some of the more famous experiments in the United States that continue to be performed at
some of the Land-Grant Universities, and are now designated on the National Register of
Historic Places, include The Old Rotation experiment on the Auburn University campus in
Alabama, The Morrow Plots on the campus of the University of Illinois, and Sanborn Field at
the University of Missouri. Mitchell et al., (2008) published that the Old Rotation experiment in
Alabama has shown over the long-term, seeding winter legumes were as effective as fertilizer N
in producing high cotton lint yields and increasing soil organic C levels. Rotation schemes with
corn or with corn-winter wheat- and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) produced no yield
advantage beyond that associated with soil organic C (Table 1). However, winter legumes and
crop rotations contributed to increased soil organic matter and did result in higher lint yields.

†Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P<0.05
‡Recent data show the effect of increasing soil organic matter on cotton productivity.
Table 1. Long-term effects of crop rotations, winter legumes and nitrogen fertilizer on cotton lint
yields at the “Old Rotation Experiment” of Auburn University in Alabama. (Mitchell, 2004).
Data from the Morrow Plots in Illinois have shown that yields from continuous corn have
always been much less than corn yields from a of corn-oats (Avena sativa L.) rotation or a or
corn-oats-and hay (clover (Trifolium spp.) or alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)) rotation (Aref and
Wander, 1998). After the introduction of hybrid corn varieties in 1937, the first plots to
show an increase in corn yields due to these varieties were the corn-oats-hay rotation. Yield
increases due to hybrids were not noticed in the corn-oat plots until the late 1940’s and in
the continuous corn plots until the early 1950’s. These lower corn yields of the continuous
corn and the slower response to corn hybridization in the corn-oat rotation appear to
coincide with long-term average levels of soil organic matter and nitrogen observed in the
various plots (Table 2).

Table 2. Soil carbon C, nitrogen N, and C-N ration from a crop rotation experiment on the
Morrow Plots of the University of Illinois.
Means of samples taken in 1904, 1911, 1913, 1923, 1933, 1943, 1953, 1961, 1973, 1974, 1980,
1986, and 1992. (Aref and Wander, 1998). Values within a column followed different letters
are significantly different P0.05.
Corn and wheat yields at Sanborn Field at the University of Missouri have been consistently
higher when grown in rotation with each other along with red clover (Trifolium pratense L.)
inter-seeded into the wheat in late winter for forage the following year (Miles, 1999). Plots
of both corn and wheat have been grown continuously since the site’s establishment in 1888,
some receiving animal manure, some commercial fertilizer, and some no fertility treatment.
All have had reduced grain yields compared to those grown in rotation, even with the
added manure and/or fertilizer.
Thirty years after Sanborn Field’s establishment, its focus began to shift to the study of
cropping systems as related to soil erosion and the resulting loss of productivity. An
experiment conducted in 1917 by F.L. Duley and M.F. Miller on the campus of the
University of Missouri used seven test plots to measure soil erosion resulting from rainfall
(Duley and Miller, 1923). This research led to creation of the Soil Conservation Service of
the USDA, which in now a component of NRCS-USDA. It led to the establishment of
experiment stations throughout the United States dedicated to the study of crop rotations on
soil erosion and developing cropping systems to minimize erosion’s impact (Weaver and
Noll, 1935). Experiments at these stations in Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Texas all
showed plots planted to a continuous cropping system had higher surface soil losses and
losses of rainfall than plots planted to a forage or in a three or four year rotation (Uhland,
1948).

2. Crop rotations vs. continuous cropping

Crop rotation schemes are, by and large, regional in nature and a specific rotation in one
environment may not be applicable in another. Continuous cropping schemes or
monocultures for the most part, have fallen out of favor in many farming regions. Roth
(1996) published mean corn yields from a 20 year crop rotation experiment in Pennsylvania
that included rotation with both soybean and alfalfa showing higher yields with all rotation
schemes than continuous corn (Table 3). The extensive use of commercial fertilizers and
pesticides has helped mask most of the beneficial effects of crop rotation. But Karlen et al.
(1994) has stated” no amount of chemical fertilizer or pesticide can be fully compensated for
crop rotation effects”. However, economics continues to be the large determining factor into
how a field is managed.

†First year corn yield
‡Second year corn yield
Table 3. Mean corn grain yields as influence by crop rotation from 1969 to1989 at Rock
Springs, PA. (Roth, 1996).
One primary benefit to crop rotation is the breaking of crop pest cycles. Roth (1996) states
that in Pennsylvania, crop rotations help control several of the crop-disease problems
common to the area such as gray leaf spot in corn (Cercospora zeae-maydis) take-all in wheat
(Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici), and sclerotina in soybean (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum). In
corn, corn rootworms (Diabrotica virgifera spp.) can be a devastating pest and crop rotation
was considered to be the most effect method of control. However, beginning in the late
1980’s there was a variant of the Western corn root worm (D. virgifera virgifera LeConte) that
began egg laying in soybean fields, making larvae present to feed upon first year corn in a
soybean-corn rotation (Hammond et al., 2009). Prior to this time the standard method to
avoiding rootworm damage was to rotate. However, during the mid-1960’s in the Cornbelt
there was a movement to engage in growing corn continuously on highly productive soils.
Atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] was being readily adopted
for weed control in corn and a number of insecticides were becoming available for of control
corn rootworm and other corn insects. Also sources of nitrogen fertilizer were readily
available and relatively inexpensive. Competitive profits for other crops, particularly
soybean, and continued research showing tangible benefits to rotations though returned
most fields to some sort of rotation scheme. However, there are some producers today who
are profitable at growing continuous corn. But, such a system appears to require strict
adherence to sound management practices.
Cotton is probably the principle crop that has been grown continuously on many fields,
some for over 100 years. The crop was profitable and well suited for production in areas
prone to hot summer temperatures and limited rainfall. There was also an infrastructure
available in these production regions for processing the lint and seed as well as a social
bond that connected the crop to the people who grew it. Corn, hay, and small grains were
the “step children” of agronomic crops for generations of southern planters. Corn and
winter oats were grown in the Cottonbelt solely as feed grains for the draft animals used to
grow cotton and the meat and dairy animals grown for home consumption. There were
basically no markets available or facilities to handle some of these crops for commercial
trade. Despite being introduced in the 1930’s, it wasn’t until the early 1950’s that soybean
became an important crop in the lower Mississippi River Valley (Bowman, 1986). Rice
(Oryza sativa L.) was introduced to the Mississippi River Delta in 1948 and together these
crops provided alternative sources of agronomic income to cotton but did little to encourage
crop rotation. Both rice and soybean were relegated to the heavier clay soils of the
Mississippi Delta with the sandy loams, silts, and silty clays remaining in cotton. It wasn’t

until changes in government support programs in the mid-1990’s that planters in the Mid
South became interested in alternatives to continuous cotton and began to produce corn for
commercial sale and rotate it with cotton. Corn hectareage in the states of Arkansas,
Louisiana, and Mississippi increased from 161,000 ha in 1990, to 382,000 ha in 2000, to
630,000 ha in 2010 (USDA-NASS, 2011).
Until 2007 research information about corn-cotton rotations were limited. An extensive
study on various corn-cotton rotation schemes yielded data on the effects of rotation on
yields and reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) a serious pest to cotton. Bruns, et al.
(2007), reported corn grain yields were greater following cotton than in plots of continuous
corn. Pettigrew, et al. (2007), noted that cotton plant height increased 10% in plots following
one year of corn and 13% following two years of corn when compared to continuous cotton
(Table 4). Lint yields increased 13% following two years of corn primarily due to a 13% in
bolls per m2. No other increases were noted however. Stetina, et al., (2007) found that
following two years of corn production, reniform nematode populations remained below
damaging levels to the cotton plants. However, cotton following just one year of corn
would have reniform nematode populations rebound to damaging levels towards the end of
the growing season.

†Lint yield for cotton; grain yield at 155 g kg-1 seed moisture; all values are means of eight reps
averaged across four genotypes.
‡Within each crop and year, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by lsd (P0.05)
Table 4. Effect of crop rotation sequence on crop yield of corn and cotton from 2000 to 2003
in Stoneville, MS. (Stetina et al., 2007).

to be continued

English Language course free download

British Council

Vocabulary

Topics

Reading

Radio Programmes

Pronunciation

Listening

Grammar

English Language Teaching Technics

English Language teaching Books

Dialogues

English Languge Training Courses

BBC-Learning English

Reading Comprehension Passages Pre-Elementary Level

Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary

learning english

learn english online

learn english for kids

learn english online conversation

learn english online free course

learn english online free beginners course

english4arab

english test

english for you

how to learn english

how to learn english accent

 how to learn english accent free online

how to learn american english accent for free

how to learn american english conversation

 how to learn american english speaking

how to learn american english pronunciation

how to learn british accent

how to learn british council

how to learn british english accent

download from here 

Chapter I : Drilling the Pay, Selecting the Interval and the Initial Design lec ( 4 )

The completion begins when the drill bit first penetrates the pay. Drilling the pay zone is one of the most important parts of the drilling procedure, thus drilling mud that is adequate for drilling the rest of the well may not be acceptable in the pay. Whereas formation damage created by the mud is acceptable in a nonproductive interval, it cannot be tolerated in the pay zone. What is needed is a mud that can control leakoff without creating permanent damage. The mud may require special treatment and occasionally, a changeout of the mud to a nondamaging fluid. There are several goals in drilling besides well control that are of interest to the completions engineer.

1. Drill a usable hole - A hole through the pay that will not accept the design size of casing limits the possibilities of the well and may impair the productivity.
2. Minimize formation permeability damage - High drilling mud overbalance pressure, uncontrolled particle size, mud filtrate that swells clays and poor leakoff control may mask the response of a productive formation to a drill stem test (DST) and may lead to bypassing a producing zone.
3. Control washouts - Hole stability problems may cause hole enlargements that make perforation and formation breakdown much more difficult.
From a drillers viewpoint, there are five main functions of a drilling mud:’ pressure control, bit lubrication, shale stability, fluid loss control and cuttings retrieval. The most important aspects of a drilling mud from a formation damage standpoint are to prevent loss of the drilling mud filtrate and to make sure that the filtrate that is lost will not react with the formation to reduce permeability. Fluid reactivity is usually controlled by using potassium chloride or other salts to stabilize the clay in the formation.2
Potassium chloride may not always control clay reactions or may require as much as 4% or more salt where smectite clay is present in the larger pore passages. Fluid loss control is accomplished by rapidly sealing off the permeable sections of the formation^.^^^ The mud accomplishes this fluid loss control by creating an almost impermeable mud cake of particles on the surface of the formation where leakoff occurs. The mud cake is produced by simple dehydration; as the liquid penetrates into the formation (the mud filtrite), the solid particles are stranded on the surface of the formation. In a properly formulated mud, there are a wide range of particle sizes that, on dehydration, fit together into a tightly compacted, very low permeability seal. By carefully controlling the size range of particles and minimizing
the clay size particles that could invade the pores of the formation, invasion damage from particles can be stopped. 4-7 In some drilling and workover fluids, fine particles and at least parts of the solids in the fluids will be designed to be acid soluble.8
The time required to form the mud cake will depend upon the mud characteristics, the permeability and the pressure differential, (Must be toward the formation for well control!) A higher permeability formation will generate a mud cake very rapidly than a low permeability formation since the rate of initial fluid loss (spurt) is higher. After the mud cake is formed, further liquid losses depend on the permeability of the cake. Formation of a cake does not insure that leakoff stops. In cases where the formation matrix permeability is between approximately 0.5 md and 100 md and the pressure differential toward the formation is small (APc1 00 psi), the filtrate of even a damaging mud will not likely extend into the formation beyond a depth of a few inches provided that the filter cake is successful in controlling leakoff. To build a successful mud cake, there must be leakoff. If the permeability is very low (e.g., kc0.05 md), the filter cake may be only poorly formed and fluid loss could be much higher than expected. This is especially true when the pay is an upper formation in a
deep well where a high density mud is used and the formation is exposed to the mud for a long period of time. Fortunately, most very low permeability formations require fracture stimulation, so the zone of damage is easily bypassed. The occurrence of the damage is important, however, since a productive interval might be missed on a test of an unstimulated well. The higher permeability formations pose special problems if the mud cake cannot be formed quickly. Since every trip out of the hole scrapes off much of the protective mud cake, the cake must reform easily to prevent the loss of large volumes of
mud filtrate into the formation. Tell-tail identifiers of a permeable formation are deflections on the SP log, bit drag and where the caliper log shows a narrow spot of slightly less than the bit diameter. This sticking point should not be confused with borehole deformation; a plastic flow of the rock in response to bore hole deformation, active faulting, folding, salt domes, etc.l5 The depth of damage created by the filtrate of the mud is directly related to the amount of driving pressure that the mud exerts on the formation. Even with a high quality mud, damage can be very deep if there is high mud overpressure. When high pressure zones elsewhere in the hole require the use of high pressure on the mud system, lower pressure zones are forced to take fluid by the pressure differential. This situation becomes critical when a zone that may be pay is broken down and fractured with the mud. Several hundred barrels of mud can be lost when the well is fractured. Some wells damaged
in this way never produce as expected. The only safe way to prevent this type of fluid loss from occurring is to case through the zones requiring high mud weights before the pay zones are drilled. Improving the filter cake and making the mud filtrate more compatible with the formation is one of the best methods of controlling formation damage. The use of inhibited filtrate prepared with potassium chloride (such as 2% KCI) will often minimize the formation damage in pays with even water sensitive sandstones.
In formations that are sensitive to fluid, the total time that the sensitive zone is exposed to mud may be critical. Once a section of the well that is known to be sensitive is penetrated, operations should continue as quickly as possible until casing can be cemented over the zone. This treatment is usually  reserved for sections of caving shale or other unstable formation; however, it may also be used very successfully in drilling pay zones that are water sensitive. If loss of permeability is plotted against accumulative fluid loss from the mud, permeability damage increases very steadily as total fluid loss increases, almost regardless of the type of fluid. This emphasizes the importance of maintaining a
high quality mud and lowering the exposure of the formation to fluid loss.
Most of the solids and cuttings from the mud are halted at the formation face and very little penetration occurs unless a poorly designed mud with a large amount of clay or silt sizes particles are used in a formation with large pore throats. The damage from these solids is most apparent in the form of formation face plugging. Movement of the solids into the formation is dependent on the size of the pores, particle size and quantity of the finest solids in the mud. Although some tests have shown several centimeter penetration of fine mud particles into high permeability ~andstonea,~ p roperly conditioned mud will probably not invade the formation.
If the formation has rubble zones (very poorly sorted grains with sizes that may range from fines to small boulders), very permeable porous sections, fractures or vugs, then severe whole mud penetration may occur and produce lasting formation damage. It is very advantageous to design the mud or completion fluid to bridge off on the face of the formation to prevent the possibility of particle invasion.
When the mud or kill fluid cannot be circulated, the formation has a lost circulation zone that has very high permeability or cannot support the weight of the mud column without fracturing. For these problem cases, special pills of LCM, lost circulation material, are often run to plug off the high perm zonesg Where the formation will not support the mud column, a cement sheath is often tried to reinforce the zone. After setting a cement plug, the hole is redrilled. The cement invades fractures and vugs, adding strength and controlling leakoff. One problem with lost circulation material (LCMs) cases is that drillers use a variety of LCMs, such as paper, sawdust, leather, grain, etc., that are very effective in preventing leakoff but cannot be removed if the zone is a pay zone. Any LCM used in a potential
pay must be easily removable. The decision on whether a mud system should be changed before the pay is drilled depends upon the sensitivity of the pay to the mud filtrate. If the formation contains swellable clays such as smectite, a filtrite sensitivity test on core from an offset well will tell whether the formation is damaged by introduction of the mud filtrate. Where core is not available, a mud with a low damage potential (potassium chloride) should be considered. Smectite clay in the pore throats is usually reactive to fresh fluids, up
to 5% or more KCI is sometimes needed to prevent clay problems in formations that have 3 to 8% smectite. In gas zones, the use of most oil-based muds should be avoided unless the mud has been proven to be of a nondamaging nature in the zone of interest. In oil or gas zones that are to be frac-tured, less emphasis is placed on the mud damage at the wellbore since a fracture will extend beyond the damage.
When natural fractures or vugs are present in the pay, whole mud can be lost. In these situations, it is often necessary to set a casing string above the pay and drill the formation without returns or use a fluid loss control additive capable of sealing fractures at the wellbore. Other methods, such as drilling the well while flowing and diverting the produced fluids, have also been considered but are dangerous in high pressure formations.
Because of damage by both incompatible filtrate and the migration of very small particles in the mud, the completion zone in many wells has been drilled with completion fluid. This practice eliminates much of the damage from mud and mud filtrate. The basic problem with the process is in completely cleaning the hole and pipe of residuals from the mud so that the left-over mud and cuttings do not contaminate the completion fluid. Fluid loss from solids free systems may be very high, especially in high permeability formations.
In very sensitive pay zones, the wells are often drilled with mud to the top of the pay and the pay itself is drilled with air, mist or foam to reduce the amount of water in contact with pay. Another method of reducing formation damage is to drill the pay with reverse circulation. This approach has been used in sensitive formations to limit the contamination of the mud by drill cuttings. Regardless of the formation sensitivity, well control must always be the Number 1 priority. The importance of drilling a usable hole through the pay and its importance on running and cementing pipe cannot be overstated. Failure to get a casing string or a liner to bottom can be very costly in terms of cost of an additional string or liner and the reduction of working space where pumps and other equipment need to be set. Simply drilling a hole with a certain diameter drill bit through a formation does not lead to a hole that will accept a string of pipe of an outside diameter just smaller than the
drill In most instances where casing cannot be run in a freshly-drilled hole, the problem is that a usable hole has not been drilled, i.e., the drift diameter of the hole is not equal to the bit diameter.
This problem is shown schematically in Figures 1.1 and 1.2. Figure 1.1 illustrates problems with hard ledges or changes in formation, while Figure 1.2 shows an extreme case of bit wobble. The spiral hole illustrated in Figure 1.2 was caused by an under-stabilized bit creating a hole too small to run the planned casing. Normally, casing strings are run with 1-112 to 2 in. minimum clearance between the hole diameter and the outside diameter of the pipe. In a straight hole, this is adequate clearance, but in a hole with an incorrect BHA (bottomhole assembly of drilling bit, collars, and stabilizers), problems will develop during running of the pipe. Drilling “slick” (drill collars in the BHA without stabilizers) usually
leads to a hole with a usable diameter significantly less than the diameter of the drill bit. Estimation
of this usable hole or drift diameter is:

The formula points out that the usable diameter of the hole may be smaller than the bit. If the hole has been drilled with the intention of running a liner, the problem may be even more pronounced. Liners are usually characterized by close tolerances between the pipe and the hole, thus it is essential that good hole diameter stability be maintained.
The type of drilling mud may also make a difference in getting pipe to the bottom. Differential sticking is caused by a pressure differential into a permeable zone that holds the pipe (or logging tool) against the wall and buries the lower side of the pipe in the mud cake.14 Sticking is increased by thick mud cakes because of increased contact area, Figure 1.3. An efficient mud forms a thin, slick mud cake with very low permeability. A thin mudcake keeps the pipe from becoming deeply embedded, resulting in less torque and drag.14 The goal is a high colloidal clay-to-silt (or cuttings) ratio that produces a slick, thin cake.

Diagnostics of stuck casing are often made after examining the drilling record and trying different types of pipe movement and circulation. A simple, stuck pipe diagnostic routine is shown schematically in Figure 1.4.14

Calculating the true vertical depth, TVD, from the measured vertical depth, MD, can be accomplished for consistent deviated wells from simple trigonometry or from tables. When wells use long turn radii, other corrections may be needed.
During drilling of wildcats or field development wells in sparsely drilled areas, mud density is handled as a function of well control, with pore pressures estimated from other data. In this type of environment, high mud overbalance conditions may occur, especially in deep formations. Although fracturing is the most obvious effect of high mud weights, excess formation permeability damage may also occur. In a study of factors influencing stimulation rates, Paccaloni, et al.,16 reports that in formations greater than 100 md, 90% of DST's were dry or doubtful when an overbalance of over 11 00 psi was used during drilling. Excessive mud overbalances should be avoided in pay zones.

Well Planning lec ( 3 )

Well Planning

Before initial operations are started on any well, a plan should be constructed that will take the well from initial drilling to plug and abandonment. There are a series of steps and operations that go into completing a successful well. Many of these are interconnected, and the expense of a well in today’s market requires that consideration be given to efficient economical planning. The method of planning is the same, regardless of the use of the well. Planning starts with cooperation and information exchange between explorers, drillers, completions and operations engineers and foremen, partner companies, service companies, equipment providers, and government regulatory officials. The information gathered in this step often prevents expensive misunderstandings that would occur during the drilling or completion of the well or disastrous environmental problems that could result from improperly executed operations. Each of the functional operations in well service involves
specialists. Too often these specialists do not have a good knowledge of the operation of other parts of the industry, and the effects that their specific actions will have on the other operations of a well. One of the first basic needs in today’s environment is to prevent pollution. There is a need to isolate all usable waters from contamination during the drilling, completion, or producing process. This step requires careful design and a concerted effort on the application side. The requirements include casing that will withstand pressure and the corrosive atmospheres that will be experienced during the life of a well, even if a sweet well turns slightly sour. It also requires consideration of cement placement and elimination of any possible means of migration of fluids through or around the borehole.
The expected use of a well, whether it be observation, production, injection, or a multiple purpose well, will influence where the well is placed, how large the casing is, and what corrosive service ratings will be required. It should be remembered that many wells serve more than one purpose during their lives.
The reservoir conditions will obviously affect the completions. The factors that are most known in this area are temperature and pressure. However, fluids, viscosity, corrosiveness of the fluids, and even the rate of fluid production become very important. Factors which are not always considered include the tendency for formation of scales, emulsions, paraffins, and asphaltenes. It is very possible by modification of the tubing string or the incorporation of special coatings to almost completely prevent many scale problems.
The rate of fluid production is the main factor in selection of the casing size. Expectations of a very high rate well cannot be met with small casing. Problems such as this are often in direct contrast to efforts to reduce well costs by using a small casing string or a small tubing string. Although initial savings in these areas can easily be made, the long-term benefits of the well weigh in heavily for larger tubulars. There are also alternatives to conventional tubing and casing strings such as monobore completions, velocity strings, tailpipe extensions, and the use of coiled tubing for rapidly run and retrieved tubing strings.
The amount of service needed during the life of a well certainly has an influence on the topside connections and the location of the wellhead itself. For sweet gas wells with very low liquid production, remote wellheads or subsea wellheads in offshore fields make very good sense. These wells would only be good where well intervention was at a minimum.
Perhaps one of the most difficult parts to effectively plan are multiple layered reservoirs. In this problem area, there is a need to process all of the reservoirs without permitting crossflow from one zone to another. Obviously, individual wells could be used to isolate each zone. However, the expense of drilling and completion are usually too high to make this a viable alternative, except in the highest rate producing areas. Other methods of effectively producing multiple reservoirs or layered reservoirs include a variety of techniques, such as tubing selectives, multiple completions, and sequenced production of reservoirs. Commingling of zones should be done when permitted by pressures and reactants that may form by mixing waters or oils of various zones. Physical well design parameters should have been dictated by the expected producing behavior of the well. Sizes of tubing and casing are set before the drilling bit selection process. During the tubular
design, the use of pup joints (short joints of casing to improve depth control of perforating and other operations), nipple locations, and the use of special equipment in a string, such as subsurface safety valves that require larger casing, are needed early in the design phase of the well. In most cases, it is advisable to minimize the number of restrictions in a producing string to make sure needed tools can pass through the string and to prevent deposits that are often caused downstream of a flow restriction. Cementing operations should be carefully planned and applied to eliminate channeling of fluid. Too
often it is assumed that the primary cement job will be a failure before the job is even pumped. This type of thinking leads to a haphazard placement of cement and a self-fulfilling prophecy requiring expensive squeeze cementing. It has been shown in a number of tests that proper quality control and attention to detail can result in effective primary cementing jobs. Perforating planning is an area that could definitely use attention during both planning and application. A variety of processes and tools are available from underbalanced to extreme overbalanced perforating and from wireline perforating to tubing conveyed perforating. Perforating expense can run from a few thousand dollars to over one hundred thousand dollars, depending on the needs of the well and the care with which it is designed. Expensive techniques are by no means always needed. The type of artificial lift that will be used on the well should have been decided long before the well was drilled. A number of artificial lift methods are available: gas lift, beam lift, plunger, jet lift, progressive
cavity pumps, electric submersible, and natural flow. Of these lift methods, beam lift, gas lift, and electric submersible pumps probably make up at least 98% of the artificial lift cases. Many wells that are on natural flow early in their life have to be artificially lifted as pressures decline or as fluid volumes increase to the point where gas drive and natural gas lift are no longer sufficient. The ability to change lift methods as fluid volumes increase or decrease is required for well operation optimization. If the casing and packer are designed with a conversion in mind, the switch of lift systems is easy.
Some formations have special needs, such as sand control. When the strength of the formation is not adequate to prevent sand grains from being dislodged by the drag forces encountered in production, then special completion techniques are needed to prevent the sand from entering the wellbore. A number of techniques have been tried, with resin consolidation of the sand and gravel packing being the primary control mechanisms. The real concern in most sand control jobs is not what type of control, but whether sand control is needed and when it is needed. The factors that cause sand movement change during the lift of the well. Some wells that will not experience sand production until after water breakthrough are gravel packed from initial completion. This is a large initial expense that can, in some cases, be delayed. Produced fluids including oil, gas, water and returning injected fluids are all reactable fluids. In addition, the well is a reactor when these fluids are moved through the well path. Conditions within this “reactor” include temperature, pressure, pressure drop and other factors such as metallurgy and clearances within the structure of the well. When the well flow path from formation to tank battery is correctly designed for the flow of a particular fluid, the detrimental reactions are very few. But when the well design is not suited to the particular fluids that must be produced, a “problem well” is often created. Produced fluids are a reactant-rich %oup” composed of natural surfactants in both the oil and the water, free and dissolved salts, hydrocarbons with carbon chain links from C, to Cso, dissolved and free mineral and hydrocarbon gases, bacteria, micelles, and over 20 possible combinations of emulsions, foams, froths, and dispersions controlled and stabilized by such things as pH, viscosity, internal phase concentration, and surface energy. When an upset occurs, the panic that ensues usually requires a quick fix. When the tank battery goes down because of a tank of “bad” oil (oil with a higher than allowable water content), chemical treating is usually required as an emergency procedure to reduce the water content and return the well to production. The total chemical approach may
be short-sighted in some instances, particularly when production upset symptoms are treated in a cyclic manner. The best approach often requires an understanding of the individual reactants and their relationship to both each other and their flow path environment. Often problem wells will yield improvements only when physical changes are made in the well design. Numerous instances are available that show chronic production upset problems being eliminated when physical changes were made to the well architecture.
An understanding of production chemistry is a critical factor in designing the downhole and surface equipment that makes up the well’s system. The approaches that must be used are much the same as initial design; however, the knowledge that liquid and gas volumes, relative amounts and pressure will change over the life of a project. Thus, some flexibility must be built in to achieve a low maintenance well system.

In general, several steps are followed when evaluating and/or designing a well system.
1. Most emulsions, including emulsions, sludges, froths, foams and dispersions, are most troublesome because of energy input and a stabilizing mechanism. By eliminating one or both of these two factors, a significant decrease can be attained in problems with phase separation. The lift system and pressure drops within the flowing system are the chief inputs of energy into an emulsion.

 2. Upsets following acidizing or any type of chemical treating may be severe and are generally based either on a solid material added with the chemical injection or by a variance in pH which affects the behavior of natural surfactants. Tracking and controlling pH can often be a significant factor in eliminating problems with upsets.

3. Production of solids from a well creates problems with emulsion stabilization, solids abrasion and all types of fluid separation. Where possible, flow of solids should be identified and the source minimized. The lift system must be designed for the expected rate after a stimulation and must take into account the recovery of the stimulation load fluid plus the method with which it commonly flows back. The most severe problems in these areas generally include hydraulic fracturing and acidizing. Once an acid job has begun
to flow back, the pH may drop, significantly affecting the amount of corrosion during the load fluid recovery stage. Jobs involving proppant fracturing often give problems because of proppant flowback in the produced fluids during the initial stage of fluid flow.
In old wells and in marginal wells there is probably no stronger need than that of consideration of produced water control. Water comes in as a response to low pressure caused by hydrocarbon production.
There may be many scenarios of water production. In some cases water drives the hydrocarbons toward the wellbore. If you shutoff the water, you will reduce the hydrocarbon production volume. In other cases leaks through bad cement, corroded casing, or through fractures can flood the well with extraneous water. In these cases a water control treatment is often useful. Where bottom water drive is severe, horizontal wells have often been used to successfully produce hydrocarbon without severe water production problems. Each of these possibilities can be addressed in the initial well plan. Control of corrosion is needed throughout the life of the wells. In many applications the well will have a very low corrosivity when first drilled, but the corrosion rate will go up significantly during the life of a well. In many wells, the original casing lasts 20 or more years before leaks are detected. Repair may bring temporary relief, but leaks may often return within a few months. Special inhibitor programs are needed as well conditions change.
Formation damage has been mentioned in earlier paragraphs, and it is well to remember that formation damage may recur during the life of the well. The most prevalent times for formation damage occurrence are during workovers and when pressure declines or water from a floodfront causes precipitation of either organic or inorganic components in the formation or in the tubing string. Modeling can often show a trend of formation damage and its effects, but the actual occurrence of formation damage can probably not be adequately predicted by any model without very exacting knowledge of well behavior.
The occurrence of formation damage or drilling of a formation that is lower permeability than expected may require stimulations. Stimulations, including fracturing, acidizing, heat, and solvents, can be applied on almost any well provided that the support equipment and the tubulars will allow the techniques to be implemented. If formation damage or stimulation need can be adequately forecasted early in the life of the well then cost reduction is often possible. For projects where enhanced recovery is envisioned, well placement and spacing become critical. In these applications the use of horizontal wells, deviated wells, and vertical wells are necessary to adequately process and sweep the reservoir. It is unfortunate that we know enough about reservoir to adequately place wells only when the reservoir is nearing depletion. With new techniques however, such as well-to-well seismic and 3D seismic, improved mapping of the reservoir if possible. This type of investigation may also yield additional pay zones and how those pay zones can be accessed. Every well that is ever drilled will require plug and abandonment. The techniques for plugging abandonment
and the rules are many and varied. The underlying objective however is very plain. Wells
should be plugged in a manner in which the fluids that are in the reservoirs will stay isolated. This need for isolation should be an overriding concern in any completion planning and must be accounted for when processes such as fracturing or well placement are considered.

Introductions Geology lec ( 2 )

The geologic understanding of the pay and the surrounding formations plays an important part in the design of well completions and stimulations. The brief introduction given here will only give a glimpse of the subject matter in the field. This treatment of geology is very simplistic; reference articles and books are available for every segment.
The type of formation, composition, strength, logging basics, leakoff sites and other parameters may be available from a detailed geologic investigation. This information is useful for pay zone identification, fluid and additive selection, longevity of fluid contact, and selecting casing points.
There are several major classifications of rocks of interest to the petroleum industry: sandstones, carbonates (limestone and dolomite) evaporites, and shales are only the major groups. Several others, such as mudstones, siltstones and washes, are subdivisions of the major classifications.
Sandstones are predominately silicon dioxide and may have various amounts of clay, pyrite, calcite, dolomite or other materials in concentrations from less than 1 % to over 50%. Sandstone formations are generally noted for being a collection of grains. The grain size may range from very small, silt sized particles (5 microns) to pea size or larger. The grains fit together to form a matrix that has (hopefully) some void space between the particles in which oil or other fluids may accumulate. The grains are usually held together by a cement that may be clay, silica, calcite, dolomite, or pyrite. Some cementation of the grains is critical for formation strength; however, excess cementation reduces porosity and permeability.
Sands are deposited in a variety of depositional environments that determine the initial sedimentkock properties. The depositional environment is simply what type of surroundings and forces shaped the deposits. In the following descriptions of depositional environment, the energy level is labeled as either high or low depending upon the level of force that accompanied the deposition of the sediments. High energy deposits are those with sufficient wind or current to move large pieces of debris while low energy is sufficient to move only the smaller particles. The importance of energy is described later.
Common depositional environments are:

1. Deltas - These mouth of river deposits provide some of the larger sandstone deposits. Because of the enormous amount of natural organic material swept down the river systems, the deltas are also rich in hydrocarbons. Quality of the reservoir rock deposits may vary widely because of the wide variations in the energy level of the systems.
2. Lagoonal deposits - May be regionally extensive along the shores of ancient seas. Lagoonal deposits are low energy deposits that are hydrocarbon rich. Permeability may vary with the energy and amount of silt.
3. Stream beds - A moderate to low energy deposit with some streaks of high energy along the fast flowing parts of the streams. Stream beds are known to wander extensively and chasing these deposits with wells requires very good geologic interpretation, plus a lot of luck. The deposit volumes are also limited and frequently deplete quickly.
4. Deep marine chalks - These are often the most massive deposits available, built up at the bottom of ancient seas by the death of millions of generations of plankton-sized, calcium fixing organisms. They can be very consistent, thick deposits. Natural fracturing is common.
5. Reefs - These formations were built in the same manner as the reefs of today, by animals that take calcium from the sea water and secrete hard structures. Because of the cavities remaining from the once living organisms, reefs that have not undergone extensive chemical modification are among the most permeable of the carbonate deposits

6. Dunes - The effects of desert winds on the sands have a shaping effect that can be seen in the arrangement of the grains. These deposits may be massive but are usually lower energy. Permeability may vary considerably from top to bottom.
7. Alluvial fan - Zones of heavy water run-off such as from mountains are extremely high energy runoffs. Common constituents of these formations may range from pebbles to boulders and cementation may be very weak. Formations such as the granite washes are in this classification.
8. Flood plains - Occur along lower energy rivers and form during flood stages when the rivers overflow the banks and spill into adjacent low areas. Flood plain deposits are mostly silt and mud.

The level of energy with each type of deposit can be visualized by their modern depositional counterparts.
The importance of energy is in the sorting of the grains and the average size of the grains. As seen in the description of permeability in the preceding section, a rock with larger grains and the absence of very small grains leads to high permeability. When small grains are present, the permeability is much lower. When there is a mixture of the very large and very small grains, such as in some alluvial fans, the permeability can be very low. The extent of grain differences in a formation is termed the “sorting”, with well sorted formations having similar sized grains and poorly sorted formations showing a very wide size range.
The events that happen after the deposit is laid down are also factors in well completions and may have a devastating effect on reservoir engineering. Some of these forces are active for a short period in geologic time such as faulting and salt domes, and others like salt flows and subsidence, are active during the productive life of the well. The faulting, folding and salt movement make some reservoirs difficult to follow. Continuous forces are often responsible for formation creep in open holes, spalling, and casing sticking and collapse problems. Although these geologic movement factors cannot be easily controlled, the well completion operations can be modified to account for many of them, if the problems
are correctly identified early in the project life.
Chemical modifications also influence the reservoirs, though much less drastically than the uplift forces of a salt dome, for example. Most carbonates (not including the reefs) are laid down by accumulation of calcium carbonate particles. Limestone may recrystallize or convert to dolomite by the addition of magnesium. Because the limestone is soluble in ground water and very stable (resistant to collapse), the limestones are often accompanied by locally extensive vugs or caverns which form from ground water flow. Recrystallization or modification by the water as is flows through the rock may also lead to a decrease in porosity in some cases.
When dolomite forms, a chemical process involving the substitution of magnesium for part of a calcium in the carbonate structure generally shrinks the formation very slightly, resulting in lower microporosity but slightly higher porosity through the vugs or the natural fracture systems. Other types of dolomitization are possible. The carbonates are marked by a tendency towards natural fractures, especially dolomite. The chalk formations may be almost pure calcium carbonate, are reasonably soft (low compressive strength) and may have very high porosities on the order of 35-45%, but relatively low permeabilities of less than, typically, 5 md.
The third formation of interest is shale. These formations are laid down from very small particles (poor sorting) that are mixed with organic materials. The organic material is often in layers, pools, or ebbs.
The shales may accumulate in deep marine environments or in lagoonal areas of very low energy resulting in almost no large particles being moved. The shales are marked by high initial porosity and extremely low permeability. Shales often serve as a seal for permeable formations. The shales are also extremely important, since they are the source for the oil that has been generated in many major plays. Oil leaves the shale over geologic time and migrates into the traps formed in sandstones, limestones and other permeable rocks.
The evaporites are deposits that are formed by the evaporation of water. Deposits such as anhydrite are usually accumulations of dried inland seas and serve as extensive local geologic markers and sealing formations. They are extremely dense with almost no porosity or permeability.
When a deposit of oil and gas is found, it usually has its origins elsewhere and been trapped in a permeable rock by some sort of a permeability limiting trap. The trapping mechanism is too extensive to be covered in a short explanation on geology, but the major traps are outlined in the following paragraphs.

1. Trapping by a sealing formation is common and accounts for some major fields. These occurrences, called unconformity traps, are where erosion has produced a rough topography with peaks and valleys. Like the rolling terrain of the surface, most formations are rarely flat; they have high and low points and may have a general rise in a direction. If an extensive sealing formation is laid down in top of the sandstone (or other pay), and the sand is exposed to migrating oil from a lower source over geologic time, the oil will accumulate in the higher points of the pay and trend “uphill” toward the point where the hill drops off or another sealing event stops the migration. Tracking these deposits is best accomplished with as complete a structural map as can be constructed. These maps of the formations highs and lows compiled from seismic and drilling data indicate the better places to drill a well -- small wonder that the maps are among the most closely guarded secrets of an oil company.

2. Faulting is an event that shifts a large block of the formation to a higher or lower position. The misalignment of the zones often provides contact with sealing formations and traps the hydrocarbon. There are several types of faulting depending on the action and movement of the rock. In areas of extensive tectonic plate movements, faulting may be extensive.

3. Folding is an uplift or a drop of part of the formation where the breaks associated with faults do not occur. The formation maintains contact with itself, although it may form waves or even be turned completely over by the event. Complete turnover is seen in the geologic overthrust belts and accounts for the same formation being drilled through three times in one well, with the middle contact upside down. Vertical wells directly on the fold will  penetrate the formation horizontal to the original plane of bedding. Although these wells offer increased local reservoir quantity when they are productive, the problems with directional permeability and sweep in a flood are often substantial.

4. Salt domes cause uplift of the formation and result in numerous small or large fields around their periphery. Faulting is often very wide spread. Brines in these areas are frequently saturated or oversaturated and evaporated salt formations, stringers and salt-fill in vugs are common. Because of the uplift of some formations from deeper burial, the productive formations may be over pressured.

5. Stratigraphic traps (permeability pinchouts) are a change in the permeability of a continuous formation that stops the movement of oil. These deposits are very difficult to observe with conventional seismic methods. This effect, combined with a sealing surface to prevent upward movement of fluid forms numerous small reservoirs and a few massive ones. Permeability pinchout may also explain poor well performance near the seal. Laminated beds with permeable sands sandwiched between thin shales are a version of the pinchout or stratigraphic trap. These deposits may be locally prolific but limited in reservoir and discontinuous. Linking the sands is the key to production.
The age of a formation is dated with the aid of fossils which are laid down with the matrix. The age of a formation is important to know if the formation has a possibility of containing significant amounts o hydrocarbon. In most cases, very old formations such as the pre-Cambrian and Cambrian contain very little possibility for hydrocarbons unless an uplift of the structure has made the formation higher than an oil-generating shale, and oil has migrated into a trap inside the formation.

Formation Sequences and Layering

Formations are almost never homogeneous from top to bottom. There is a considerable amount of variation, even in a single formation, between permeability and porosity when viewed from the top of the zone to the bottom. When formations are interbedded with shale streaks, they are referred to as a layered formation. The shale streaks, often laid down by cyclic low energy environments, may act as seals and barriers and form hundreds or thousands of small isolated reservoirs within a pay section  Many times, the layering is too thin to be spotted by resistivity or gamma ray logs. When a formation is known to be layered, the completion requirements change. Perforating requirements may rise from
four shots per foot to 16 shots per foot, and in many cases, small fracturing treatments may prove very beneficial even in higher permeability formations.

Action plan 4 teachers free download learning English

download from here

Learn English with BBC World Service
BBC World Service broadcasts radio programmes for learners and teachers of English. Many programmes include
explanations in the learner’s own language. The programmes are graded to suit all levels of learner and cover a variety of
topics, such as English for business, current affairs, science, literature, music and English teaching.
Many of the radio programmes are accompanied by printed material, including free information sheets and booklets. These
support materials are based on the content of the radio programmes and also contain additional background information
on the subjects covered. Action Plan for Teachers is one of three new booklets from BBC World Service. The other two are
The Mediator, which uses authentic material to present and explain the language used in the news and broadcast media
and which is of particular interest to anyone pursuing a career in the media, and The Business, which is a self-help guide
to essential business concepts - from entrepreneurship to globalisation - that includes practical help on how to get ahead.
The BBC World Service’s Learning English website is a comprehensive online resource for both learners and teachers of
English. Material from the radio programmes plus information on many topics associated with English language learning can
be found on these pages. The site also includes interactive exercises combining audio, video and text and can be found at:
www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish
For an automatic email response giving information about English learning and teaching programmes, send an email to:
eltradio@bbc.co.uk
To find out more about learning English with BBC World Service, write to:
BBC World Learning
BBC World Service
Bush House
Strand
London WC2B 4PH
UK
© British Broadcasting Corporation 2000
Action Plan for Teachers
Written by: Callum Robertson and including some material adapted from the English One to One teacher’s book written
by Richard Acklam.
Edited by: Tim Moock
Illustrated by: Tania Lewis at Doodlebugs, except for page 30 illustrated by Tim Moock.
Cover images: top and bottom © British Broadcasting Corporation, middle © The British Council
About the authors
Callum Robertson
has worked in English Language teaching since 1986. He has taught in Japan, China and Denmark as well as in the UK. He
is a teacher trainer and writer, producer and presenter for BBC World Service. He has a degree in Drama from the Univeristy
of Hull and the RSA Dip. TEFLA.
Richard Acklam
is a freelance ELT teacher, teacher trainer and textbook writer. He has worked in Cairo, Paris and London and has an MA
(TEFL) from the Uni versity of Reading.

Contents

Introduction 1
Planning
Pre-planning 2
• What should go into an English language lesson? 2
• What is a lesson plan? 3
• Why is planning important? 4
• Do you need to plan if you have a course book? 5
• What are the principles of planning? 5
Planning a lesson 7
• Aims and concepts 7
• Contexts and marker sentences 7
• Starting a lesson 8
• Presenting new language 9
• Controlled practice 10
• Freer (less controlled) practice 11
• Finishing the lesson 13
Action
Methodology 14
• Use of the mother tongue 14
• Eliciting 14
• Board work 15
• Drilling 15
• Pronunciation 17
• Organising student practice 18
• Exploiting listening and reading texts 19
Technology 21
• Overhead projectors 21
• Tape recorders 22
• Radio 24
• Television and video 26
• Computers and the internet. 28
Activities 30
• Warmers 30
• Presentation techniques 32
• The Phonemic Char t 37
Glossary 38