workover (Why do we make work over?)


Workovers Performed To

Increase or restore hydrocarbon production 
Decrease water production
Repair mechanical failures
Common Reasons for a Workover 
Some of the more common reasons for a workover are:
Repair mechanical damage
Stimulate an existing completion
Complete into a new reservoir
Complete multiple reservoirs 
Reduce/eliminate water/gas production
Reduce/eliminate water coning
Repair faulty cement jobs
 
Repair Mechanical Damage
Reasons for Workover Work

Mechanical damage can take on many forms from failed tubing or downhole tools such as packers, sliding sleeves, gas lift equipment, tubing or wireline retrievable safety valves, to failed or failing wellheads. In some cases the repair can be performed without killing the well, in other cases the well has to be killed to perform the work safely.


  Reservoir Simulation

Reservoir stimulation is usually accomplished by introducing a mild acid through the perfs and into an existing producing reservoir for the purpose of dissolving acid soluble solids and regaining or restoring production. This can be done by a coiled tubing unit, snubbing unit, or small tubing unit.
  
Completing a New 
Reservoir
Completing to a new reservoir is often done when a well is drilled through multiple productive layers and the lower zone is finally depleted. The new completion might be as simple as shifting a sleeve open to allow flow, or may require that the lower zone be plugged and abandoned before the upper zone is allowed access into the wellbore.
  

Completing an Existing Zone
In this case the lower depleted zone is isolated with a cement plug prior to opening the sleeve adjacent to the next zone to be produced.
After the cement plug is in place and tested, the sleeve can be opened and the next zone produced
  

Recompleting an Existing Zone
Production tubing above the depleted zone has been cut and removed and the lower zone isolated with a cement plug. The new completion is run in the hole adjacent to the reservoir to be produced, the zone is perforated. And production begins.

Here the lower depleted zone has been isolated with a plug conveyed by either coiled tubing or wireline. After the plug has been successfully set and tested the sliding sleeve is opened allowing production from the upper zone.


  Completing Multiple Reservoirs
A dual completion, such as this one, allows for production from two zones simultaneously.
  


Unwanted Water Reduction
Water, the lowermost fluid in a reservoir, appears as the lighter fluids are depleted. Initial production may contain a degree of water, but the oil-to-water ratio usually decreases throughout the life of the well. Remediation for this problem can be squeezing affected perforations – but this solution is only temporary.
 

Water Coning
Excessive production rates can initiate water coning. Water, which may be the the drive mechanism or the lower fluid strata in the reservoir, is pulled up into the perfs. Water coning can be controlled to some extent by reducing the production rate. But, usually, the affected perforations are squeezed resulting in lower production outputs on a daily basis.
  

Repair Failed Cement Jobs
Evidence of a failing cement job are usually manifested as pressure appearing on the intermediate casing string and the presence of chunks of cement in the choke body. This may also be accompanied by a decrease in daily production as surface lines can become clogged with cement. Repairing this usually entails killing the well, squeezing cement into the perforations, recompleting and reperforating the well.
  

Unwanted Gas Production
In a gas cap driven reservoir, the gas cap expands as oil is drawn from the reservoir. Eventually the expanding gas cap can encroach on the perforations and gas production will begin. The drawbacks are: the drive mechanism is being produced and the production train may not be able to handle the gas being produced. This is temporarily remedied by squeezing the perfs. But eventually mostly gas will be produced as the producible oil is depleted.
 

3-D Structural Geology

Richard H. Groshong, Jr.
3-D Structural Geology
A Practical Guide to Quantitative Surface
and Subsurface Map Interpretation
Second Edition

Author
Richard H. Groshong, Jr.
University of Alabama
and
3-D Structure Research
10641 Dee Hamner Rd.
Northport, AL 35475
USA





Shale Shakers Drilling Fluid Systems

Shale Shakers Drilling Fluid Systems handbook


METHODS OF DEFLECTING A WELLBORE con't 4

Steerable Motor Assembly





Effect of bend housing angle on build rate and bit side load
 
Effect of hole erosion on build rate

 

Baker motor stabilization configuration 
  • The expected build rate will depend upon the motor configuration

  
  • Build rate for a fully stabilized motor assembly 
  • Can rotate to a bend of 1.5o
  
  •     Build rate for a fully partially stabilized motor assembly Can rotate to a bend of 1.5o

 
Build rate for a slick motor assembly
Can rotate to a bend of 1.6o
 
The build rate will depend upon

-Motor stabilization
-Hole size
-Motor size
-Distance from bit to bend
-Stabilizer diameter (undergage)
-Etc.
Rotary steerable 
Steerable without sliding (100% rotation)
Can change both inclination and direction 

Steerable motor in the slide and rotate mode
Theoretically in the rotary mode, it will drill straight ahead
Limitations of steerable 
motors in the slide mode
 
  •   Sometimes difficult to slide due to hole drag and stabilizers hanging up
  •   Difficulty maintaining orientation especially as the well gets deeper and the drill string gets smaller
  •   More difficult to maintain orientation with a PDC bit because of higher bit torques versus bit weight   
  •   Poor hole cleaning while in the slide mode.  Rotation helps clean the hole
  •   Lower effective penetration rate.  Harder to keep a constant weight on bit in slide mode.  Time is spent orienting the motor.
  •   Higher wellbore tortuosity
  •   Differential pressure sticking
  •   Build rate is formation sensitive  
Limitations of steerable motors in the rotate mode  
  •   Higher vibrations lead to motor and MWD failure
  •   Accelerated bit wear
  •    Poor hole quality for logs (sometimes)
  •   Poor performance in air  
The rotary steerable system address some but not all of the limitations  
These rotary steerable concepts were patented in the 1950’s, but the design is being used today

Guidance systems were required to make them work
 
Rotary steerable systems being designed and used today
 
Schlumberger rotary steerable system
 
Gyrodata rotary steerable system
 
Economics of rotary steerable
 
Rotary steerable can improve hole cleaning with 100% rotation
Rotary steerable assemblies have the potential to reduce overall dogleg severity
Rotary steerables can still drill directionally when the pipe will not fall into the hole with its own weight (steerable motor cannot slide)
 
Service companies eventually want to get the rotary steerable to drill the hole without interference from the surface
The directional program is placed in the MWD
The computer computes a position and determines what it needs to do to get to the target and takes the appropriate action
 
All the drilling contractor does is add drill pipe like drilling a vertical well
It would not be applicable where the directional target changes based on geosteering data

Equation for calculating toolface angle to change direction and azimuth
 
Need to change inclination from 14o to 25o and change azimuth from 10o to 48o  
 

METHODS OF DEFLECTING A WELLBORE

METHODS OF DEFLECTING A WELLBORE con't